Anecdotes of the American Indians, illustrating their eccentricities of character — John Shaqi
Anecdotes of the American Indians, illustrating their eccentricities of character
History
Anecdotes of the American Indians, illustrating their eccentricities of character
Indians of North America -- Anecdotes
In the year 1674, the number of Eliot’s towns and settlements, in
which industry, comfort, good order, and the best instruction, were
established, amounted to more than twelve, when an unforeseen event
happened, that threw a cloud over all his prospects. This was the war
in which the colonists of New England were involved with Philip, son of
Massasoit, the celebrated chief, and, for the last years of his life,
the firm friend of the English. “O, thou sword of the wilderness, when
wilt thou be quiet?” says Mather, forgetful that it was bared by the
aggressions of the settlers, as well as by the fierce and restless
spirit of the Indian prince. Ever since the foundation of the colonies,
the former had conducted themselves, says more than one divine of the
period, with great kindness to their heathen brethren. The truth of
this assertion is very doubtful. The missionary took no part in the
disputes, save to urge his countrymen to forbearance and peace. “We,
the poor church of Naticke,” he writes to them, “hearing that the
honoured rulers of Plymouth are pressing and arming of soldiers to go
to war with the Indians, do mourn greatly on account of it, and desire
that they may not be destroyed, because we have not heard that they
have done any thing worthy of death. It is your duty to offer, accept,
and desire peace, and we pray you, for God’s sake, and for your souls’
sake, obey this word; we long to hear of a happy peace, that may open
a clear passage for the gospel among that people.” Simple as these
words are, they unfold an affection, on the part of the missionary
and his converts, for those who had few claims on their regard; for
Philip, and most of his chiefs, had sternly rejected all persuasions to
Christianity. But Eliot was not of the sentiment of another divine, who
rejoiced in the rejection of the proposals by the Indians, that “this
thing was of the Lord.” He saw only on one side an exquisite jealousy,
roused by many wrongs, a heart burning with vindictive feelings; on the
other, a sordid ambition, an unhallowed love of glory. It was a source
of sorrow, that the torch of discord was first kindled by one of his
own people. In the end of the year 1674, John Seusoman, a converted
Indian, after having apostatized from the faith, devoted himself to
the service of Philip, as secretary. He informed the English that his
countrymen had resolved to adopt measures for their destruction. “He
could write,” says the historian, “though the king, his master, could
not read.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account