[Sidenote: Hugh of Lincoln.] Fo: 96. pa: 2. vppon these woordes, “O hughe of Lincolne sleyne also, &c.” You saye, that in the 29. H. 3. eightene Jewes were broughte fro{m} Lincolne, and hanged for crucyfyinge a childe of eight yeres olde. Whiche facte was [in] the 39. H. 3. so that yo{u} mighte verye well haue sayed, that the same childe of eighte yeres olde was the same hughe of Lincolne; of whiche name there were twoe, viz. thys younger Seinte Hughe, and Seinte Hughe bishoppe of Lincolne, whiche dyed in the yere 1200, long before this litle seinte hughe. And to prove [that] this childe of eighte yeres olde and that yonge hughe of Lincolne were but one; I will sett downe two auctoryties out of Mathewe Paris and Walsinghame, whereof the fyrste wryteth, that in the yere of Christe 1255, beinge the 39. of Henrye the 3, a childe called Hughe was sleyne by the Jewes at Lyncolne, whose lamentable historye he delyvereth at large; and further, in the yere 1256, being 40. Hen. 3, he sayeth, Dimissi sunt quieti 24 Judei à Turri London, qui ibidem infames tenebantur compediti pro crucifixione sancti Hugonis Lincolniæ: All whiche Thomas Walsingham, in Hypodigma Neustriæ, confirmeth; sayinge, A^o. 1255. Puer quidam Christianus, nomine HUGO, à Judeis captus, in opprobriu{m} Christiani nominis crudelitèr est crucifixus. [Sidenote: “Where the sunne is in his ascensione,” a good reading.] Fo: 86. pa: 8. (Where the sunne is in his ascensione, &c.) You will us to reade for the same, Ware the soone in his ascensione Ne fynde you not replete of humors hotte, For yf yt doe, &c. But, savinge correct{i}one, the former sence is good: for these woordes: Where the sonne is in his ascensione, must haue relat{i}one to the woordes of the verse before, Ye be righte colericke of complex{i}one,