Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
No. 64 learned to get out of a certain pen (16 × 10 inches) by crawling
under the wire screening at a certain spot. There was also a chance to
get out by walking up an inclined plane and then jumping down. No. 66 was
put in with 64. After 9 minutes 20 seconds, 66 went out by the inclined
plane, although 64 had in the meantime crawled out under the screen 9
times. (As soon as he got out and ate a little he was put back.) It was
impossible to judge how many of these times 66 really saw 64 do this.
He was looking in that direction 5 of the times. So also, in three more
trials, 66 used the inclined plane, though 64 crawled under each time. 67
was then tried. In 4 minutes 10 seconds, he crawled under, 64 having done
so twice. Being then put in _alone_, he, without the chance to imitate,
still crawled under. So probably he went under _when with 64_ not by
imitation but by accident, just as 64 had learned the thing himself.
[Illustration: Fig. 19. Fig. 20.]
The accompanying figure (19) shows the apparatus used in the next
experiment. A represents the top of a box (5 × 4 inches), 13 inches above
the level of the floor C. On the floor C were the chicks and food. B is
the top of a box 10 inches high. Around the edges of A except the one
next B a wire screen was placed, and 65 was repeatedly put upon A until
he learned to go quickly back to C _via_ B. Then the screen was bent
outward at X so that a chick could barely squeeze through and down (A to
C). Eleven chicks were then one at a time placed on A with 65. In every
case but one they went A-C. In the case of the chick (75) who went A-B-C,
there could have been no imitation, for he went down _before_ 65 did. One
other went through the hole before 65 went to B. The remaining nine all
had a chance to imitate 65 and to save the uncomfortable struggle to get
through the hole, 65 going A-B-C 8 times before 68 went A-C, 2 times when
with 66 and 76, once in the case of each of the others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account