Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of ReproductionDavenport, John
Philosophy
Aphrodisiacs and Anti-aphrodisiacs: Three Essays on the Powers of Reproduction
Davenport, John
Phallicism; Sex; Sex customs -- France -- History -- 17th century
Maundrell, who travelled in the East in the 17th century, informs us
that, having asked the chief priest of Aleppo what sort of a plant or
fruit the Dudaïm, or (as we translate it) the _mandrakes_, were which
Leah gave to Rachel for the purchase of her husband's embraces, the
holy man replied "that they were plants of a large leaf bearing a
certain sort of fruit, in shape resembling an apple, growing ripe in
harvest, but of an ill savour, and not wholesome. But the virtue of them
was to _help conception_, being laid under the genial bed. That the
women were wont to apply it at this day, out of an opinion of its
prolific virtue."[93]
Some writers have supposed the Dudaïm to be neither more nor less than
the truffle. Virey asserts it to be a species of Orchis; and, indeed,
considering the remarkable conformation of the root of this plant,[94]
the slightly spermatic odour of its farinaceous substance, as well as
that of the flowers of another one belonging to the same family, an
odour so similar to the emanations of an animal proverbial for its
salaciousness, and to which its bearded spikes or ears give additional
resemblance, the almost unbounded confidence which the ancients reposed
in its aphrodisiacal virtues cannot appear surprising.
One of the most extraordinary aphrodisiacs upon record is that reported
to have been employed by the Amazons. The "Amazons," says
Eustathius,[95] "broke either a leg or an arm of the captives they took
in battle, and this they did, not only to prevent their attempts at
escape, or their plotting, but also, and this more especially, to render
them more vigorous in the venereal conflict; for, as they themselves
burnt away the right breast of their female children in order that the
right arm might become stronger from receiving additional nutriment, so
they imagined that, similarly, the genital member would be strengthened
by the deprivation of one of the extremities, whether a leg or an arm."
Hence, when reproached by the Scythians with the limping gait of her
slaves, Queen Antianara replied, "[Greek: arista chôlos oiphei]," "the
lame best perform the act of love."
Among the ancient Romans, it was impossible that philters, or
love-potions, should not be introduced amid the general depravity so
common in every class; and hence we meet with frequent allusions to them
in their writers. Thus, the emperor Julian, surnamed the Apostate,
writing to his friend Callixines, observes "At enim inquies, Penelopes
etiam amor et fides erga virum tempore cognita est. Et quis, tandem,
inquam, in muliere amorem conjugis sui religioni ac pietati anteponet
_quam continuò mandragoræ bibesse judicitur_?"[96]
"But you, Callixines, observe that Penelope's love to her
husband was always thus manifested. To this I answer, who
but he _that has habitually drunk Mandragora_ can prefer in
a woman conjugal affection to piety?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account