Apis Mellifica; or, The Poison of the Honey-Bee, Considered as a Therapeutic AgentWolf, C. W.
Science
Apis Mellifica; or, The Poison of the Honey-Bee, Considered as a Therapeutic Agent
Wolf, C. W.
Bees -- Venom -- Therapeutic use; Homeopathy
This is the general result, unless psoric, sycosic, syphilitic or
vaccinine complications should be present. Unfortunately the abuse of
cathartics excites these miasms if they exist in the organism, and at
the same time prostrates the reactive powers of the organism, and
enables its enemies to rise against it. The distress becomes more and
more complicated; disorganizations, alterations of the fluids,
disturbances of the assimilative sphere, nervous derangements from
simple illusions of the sentient sphere, and occasional trembling and
twitching, to spasmodic and convulsive movements, and final extinction
of nervous power, marasmus of the spinal marrow or a ramollissement of
the brain; these are the consequences of such miasmatic complications.
In such a case Apis alone is not sufficient. We have to employ such
antidotes as _Sulphur_, our most powerful anti-psoric which, unless it
had been abused previously, never leaves us in the lurch in the presence
of psora; _iodine_ which, under similar circumstances, becomes
indispensable wherever psora and sycosis are combined; _bichromate of
potash_ or _fluoric acid_, if psora, syphilis and mercurial poisoning
are united; and lastly, _tartar emetic_, or again _fluoric acid_, if the
vaccine poison alone, or in combination with the other poisons, occupies
the foreground.
This is not the place to treat of these special forms of human distress,
and to individualize their treatment; I shall endeavor to do this on a
more suitable occasion. I shall have to limit myself here to a
superficial sketch of the treatment, adding merely that a single dose of
the specific antidote will act best if given highly potentized, and that
the improvement should afterwards be allowed to progress as long as a
trace of it remains visible. But as soon as the improvement stops and an
exacerbation sets in, which is not speedily followed by another
improvement, or which seems to require our aid, we use Apis 3, one drop
every day, until the improvement is again perceived, after which we wait
until another exacerbation demands our interference. One dose of Apis is
often insufficient; if not, from three to five doses will be found
sufficient to mitigate the pains, and to advance the cure which Apis
will complete in conjunction with the high potency that should not be
repeated, and which is not interfered with by the Apis. What more
precious boon for the physician and patient in these serious moments? It
is only a physician who has instituted provings upon himself, that is
capable of comprehending this harmonious blending of the two therapeutic
agents. He sees the well known effects of a well known cause go and come
at alternate periods. What man of common sense would be willing to
repudiate such evidence?
But even in a case where Sulphur and Iodine had been given to excess,
and a sort of Sulphur and Iodine diathesis had been established in
consequence, Apis is still the best remedy to meet this complicated
derangement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account