Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, July 1899: Volume LV, No. 3, July 1899Various
Religion
Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, July 1899: Volume LV, No. 3, July 1899
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
When acetylene is burned in air under such conditions that the flame
does not smoke, it has been proved by Gréhant that there is no carbon
monoxide among the combustion products; the acetylene combines with
the oxygen of the air to form carbon dioxide and water (C_{2}H_{2} +
5O = 2CO_{2} + H_{2}O). One cubic foot of acetylene requires two and a
half cubic feet of oxygen. Supposing a room to have an illumination
equal to sixty-four standard candles; this amount of light from
candles would use up 38.5 cubic feet of oxygen from the air, and would
give off forty-three cubic feet of carbon dioxide; petroleum requires,
in cubic feet, twenty-five of oxygen, and gives off forty of carbon
dioxide; gas burned with a flat flame requires about twenty-five
oxygen and gives nineteen carbon dioxide--with an Argand flame a
little less, while with the Welsbach burner gas requires only three
oxygen, and gives off 1.8 carbon dioxide; acetylene requires five
oxygen and yields four carbon dioxide. So that, light for light,
acetylene fouls the air less than any ordinary illuminant excepting
the Welsbach gas burner. (With incandescent electric light there is no
combustion and no fouling of the air.)
Under the best conditions five cubic feet of acetylene give a light of
two hundred and forty candles for one hour, or we may speak of
acetylene as a two-hundred-and-forty-candle gas. Yet this statement,
though strictly true, may be misleading. When ordinary illuminating
gas is tested with the photometer, it is burned from a standard
flat-flame burner, burning five cubic feet per hour. Now the amount of
light given by such a gas flame is no greater than is pleasant to the
eye; it is true that if we burn five cubic feet of acetylene from a
suitable flat-flame burner, a light of two hundred and forty candles
is given, but it is unfair to take this ratio as representing the
actual relative illuminating value of the two lights, because we
neither need a light of two hundred and forty candles, nor is such an
amount of light issuing from one burner endurable to the eye. One-foot
or one-half foot acetylene burners are used for domestic lighting;
light from the best one-foot burners averages thirty-two to
thirty-five candles per cubic foot. With acetylene, as with every
other illuminating gas, the smaller the burner and consumption, the
less light per cubic foot of gas is obtained. Another important point
is that while these figures represent the best practical illumination
obtained from acetylene by the burners hitherto in use, the standard
flat-flame burner does not give the best gaslight; with a good
Welsbach burner a cubic foot of illuminating gas will give a
seventeen-candle light as an average. The comparison, to be fair,
should be between acetylene and the Welsbach light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account