Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The general absence of color in cave animals is conceded. Packard
states, “As regards change of color, we do not recall an exception to
the general rule that all cave animals are either colorless or nearly
white, or, as in the case of Arachnida and insects, much paler than
their out-of-door relatives.” Chilton has made the same observation on
the underground animals of New Zealand. Similar observations have been
recorded by Lönnberg, Carpenter, Schmeil, and Viré. Hamann enumerates a
number of species living both in caves and above ground. In such cases
the underground individuals are paler than the others. This confirms
similar observations by Packard.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.--_Chologaster papilliferus_ from Illinois.]
Poulton has mentioned that Proteus becomes darker when exposed to the
light. This has been verified by others. Typhlotriton larvæ living at
the entrance of a cave are dark, while the adult living farther in the
cave are much lighter, but with many chromatophores containing a small
amount of color. Epigæan fishes found in caves are always lighter in
color than their _confrères_ outside.
[Illustration: FIG. 3.--_Typhlichthys subterraneus._]
We have thus numerous examples of colored epigæan animals bleaching in
caves, and also bleached cave animals turning dark when exposed to the
light. We have also animals in which the side habitually turned to the
dark is colorless, while the side habitually turned to the light is
colored. Finally, we have cave animals that are permanently bleached.
Natural selection can not have affected the coloration of the cave
forms, for it can be absolutely of no consequence whether a cave
species is white or black. It could affect the coloration only
indirectly in one of two ways: First, as a matter of economy, but
since the _individual_ is in part bleached by the direct effect of the
darkness there is no reason why natural selection should come into
play at all in reducing the pigment as a matter of economy; second,
Romanes has supposed that the color decreases through the selection of
correlated structures--a supposition he found scarcely conceivable when
the variety of animals showing the bleached condition is considered.
[Illustration: Fig. 4 _a._]
[Illustration: Fig. 4 _b._]
[Illustration: Fig. 4 _c._
FIG. 4 _a_, _b_, _c_.--Three views of _Amblyopsis_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account