Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
This process does not, of course, account for the degeneration of the
eye beyond blindness. But, aside from this objection, the humor of his
“glimmer of light” impresses itself very forcibly on one after spending
a day in following the devious windings of a living cave, not to
mention his tendency in cave animals, which are negatively heliotropic,
to follow it. There are other objections. Fishes are annually swept
into the caves, but they are not able to establish themselves in
them. To do this they must have peculiar habits, special methods of
feeding and mating before a successful colonization of caverns can
become successful. Further, if the origin of the cave fauna is due to
accident, the accident must have happened to four species out of six of
the Amblyopsidæ, while none of the numerous other species of fishes
about the caves met with the same accident.
2. The second explanation is that of Herbert Spencer:[E] “The existence
of these blind cave animals can be accounted for only by supposing
their remote ancestors began making excursions into the caves, and,
finding it profitable, extended them, generation after generation,
farther in, undergoing the required adaptations little by little.”
[E] Popular Science Monthly, vol. xliii, pp. 487, 488.
This second view has been modified by H. Garman in so far as he
supposes the adaptations to do without eyes and consequent degeneration
of eyes to occur anywhere where a species has no use for eyes,
enumerating burrowing animals and parasitic animals, concluding that
“the origin of the cave species (nonaquatic especially) of Kentucky
were probably already adjusted to a life in the earth before the caves
were formed.” In this modified sense, Spencer’s view is directly
applicable to the Amblyopsidæ. Hamann goes so far as to suppose that
darkness itself is not the primary cause of degeneration, but unknown
factors in the animal itself.
[Illustration: FIG. 8.--Lateral view of _Chologaster papilliferus_,
showing the location of the tactile ridges.]
The three things to be considered in this connection are (_a_) the
habit of the cave form, (_b_) the modifications to enable the form to
do without the use of light, and (_c_) the structure of the eye as a
result of _a_ and _b_.
_a._ The prime requisite for a candidate to underground existence is a
negative reaction to light. We found that even the epigæan Chologaster
is negatively heliotropic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account