Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906. — John Shaqi
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The other point is one which can be clearly understood. It is now the
right of colleges and libraries, an important right, that in case of
an English book they should be able to get the English edition, which
in some instances is more complete or for other reasons better than
the American edition. But it can almost never be an important right to
obtain the English edition of an American book since the American
edition is almost always more complete, or equally complete. So that
the right to import the foreign edition of an American book, a book of
American origin, would ordinarily be confined to the Tauchnitz and the
like editions with which the gentlemen of the committee are all
familiar, where a continental publisher publishes English and American
books for the benefit of travelers, and they are not allowed to be
reimported into England or America. It seems to the publishers fair
that the same rule which applies to every Englishman and every
American as to such Tauchnitz editions should be applied to libraries;
that is, that they should get the American edition, and not the other,
of which the only advantage is cheapness, arising from its special
purpose.
Whether or not these are reasonable changes has been very largely
passed upon, it seems to me, in the controversy that has gone on with
the American Library Association, which is a very powerful and very
diligent and active association, and which has been very much
interested in these matters; and in laying before you their approval
of the bill in its present shape, it seems to me that as to this
clause it must establish in the minds of the committee a clear prima
facie case, at least, that this compromise that is agreed upon is a
reasonable compromise. There are gentlemen here who represent certain
libraries who, I understand, think that it is not a reasonable
compromise.
Mr. CURRIER. That minority is a very strong one, is it not?
Mr. OLIN. I think it is a strong one; and they undoubtedly will be
heard. They object that this compromise goes too far; and all that we
can reasonably ask the committee at this moment is that if it
occurs--if it seems to the committee that what this minority of
librarians have to say overcomes the presumption of fairness that
arises from a compromise satisfactory to the majority--that then the
publishers may have their opportunity of showing to the committee that
it is a fair compromise and a reasonable disposition of the matter.
Now, we come to the next clause of these exceptions.
Mr. CURRIER. Just an instant. Would the people you represent object
seriously to an amendment to subdivision 3, on page 16, which would
strike out all after the words "United States" where they occur?
Mr. OLIN. On page 16?
Mr. CURRIER. In the tenth line of subdivision 3.
Mr. OLIN. Are you reading from the printed form of the bill?
Mr. CURRIER. The library print.
Mr. CHANEY. Section 21?
Mr. CURRIER. I have not compared them. I have been using the library
print all the time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account