Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. OLIN. The practical working would be this: Scribner & Co. would
publish here a book which was also published in England. An individual
would wish to get a copy of it in the English edition, and he would
either go to the Scribners' store, or write to him, or he would go to
his bookseller, who would send word to the Scribners, asking that a
copy should be imported for that individual through Mr. Scribner, and
Scribner would import it for him. That is to say, the individual would
have far less difficulty, wherever he was situated throughout the
country, in getting the English edition of the book than he has at
present, when he himself writes to an English bookseller in London and
imports it himself.
Mr. CURRIER. I am not expressing any opinion at all as to the
correctness of that proposition, whether the individual should not be
prohibited from importing.
Mr. OLIN. My point is that the facility with which the individual
would obtain an English edition of an American copyrighted book would
be greatly increased by the passage of this bill, because it would put
it in the regular course of business, just as it used to be before
1891, for the owner of the American copyright to see to those
importations. The law would not allow the proprietor himself to make
the importations, but he would be exceedingly glad to import that book
for A, B, C, D, and E, all over the country, and to make it just as
easy as it was possible to do for them to get that English edition.
Mr. CURRIER. I am not at all sure that that is not so, but I think you
agree with me that the individual himself, under that provision, would
never directly import a book.
Mr. OLIN. I think he would not.
Mr. CURRIER. The proprietor would always do it for him.
Mr. OLIN. It would be so much easier for him to make the proprietor
his agent, and the proprietor would be so glad to act as his agent,
and it would be so much to the interest of both parties that that
should be so that that would be naturally the course that it would
take.
Mr. HINSHAW. Under existing law is the proprietor of the American
copyright seriously injured by these importations?
Mr. OLIN. In ordinary cases, as I said, he is not seriously
injured--that is, in the case of popular books he is not substantially
injured at all. He does not know how much he is injured, because there
is no means of estimating the precise amount. It is an injury, but how
great he does not know.
Mr. HINSHAW. It is a sufficient injury, so that you think it ought to
be restricted?
Mr. OLIN. It is a sufficient injury, especially in the cases that I
have spoken of, where valuable books that cost very much to produce
and that have a limited field of sale are in question, and there it
does repeatedly prevent such books from being published in America.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account