Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
In regard to the publication of books under two titles, it seems to me
that some provision should be made in the law to protect a man who
publishes a book that is printed abroad under one title and is printed
in this country under another, provided the foreign edition does not
contain notice of copyright. As it is to-day, and as it will be under
this law, one can import a book printed in England; it may have been
written on the same subject as that which you intended to produce a
book on; you have carefully warned your editors to abstain from making
extracts from a book that is printed in this country or that contains
a notice of copyright. You proceed. Your editor finds a book in a
library that does not contain notice of United States copyright. It is
published abroad by a publisher different from the one who issues it
here. There is nothing to warn him. He makes copious extracts, and the
owner of the copyright may be perfectly well aware of the fact that he
has made those extracts. Under this law as it is proposed, he may
permit that infringement to continue for three years and then claim
damages, not less than one dollar a copy, although the book may have
been sold for 10 cents per copy, and practically put the apparently
infringing publisher, who acted in perfect good faith, out of
business. It is unjust; and I submit, gentlemen, that those matters
are proper subjects for consideration, and that they should not be
enacted into a law in their present form.
Now, to refer to some of the remarks made by my predecessor, Mr. Olin.
He said that the American Publishers' Copyright League and the
American Publishers' Association represented practically all of the
publishers of the United States. I differ distinctly and materially
with him. They do not. They represent a few and only a few of the
publishers of the United States. I doubt very much if a single
publisher west of the Alleghenies (with very few exceptions) is a
member of either of those associations. There may be a few
exceptions--I know now that there are--but very few, and he is not
qualified to speak for the others who are not members of those
associations, and they do not represent a majority.
In regard to importation, he said that Scribner would be very glad to
import a book if he were requested to do so. Now, I am a publisher,
and if it were my book I do not think I should be very glad. I think I
should tell the intending purchaser that I had a copy of the book that
was at his disposal for the fixed price that I had placed upon it, and
I think Scribner would do likewise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account