Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
“In 1204 A.D., the Capital (Constantinople) was captured by the
Crusaders, whose conduct fixed an indelible stain upon the name of
the Franks throughout the East, especially as it is contrasted with
that of the Mohammedans, who, a few years before, had conquered
Jerusalem. When Saladin entered the latter city the church of the
Holy Sepulchre was respected, and the conquered Christians remained
in possession of their property; no confiscations were made of the
wealth of the non-combatants. But the vaunted chivalry of the Papal
church plundered a Christian city without remorse, desecrated its
shrines, and maltreated its inhabitants, while the profane cry of
‘God Wills It,’ was raised to excite each other to act the part of
brigands and debauchees. Sacred plate, golden images of saints,
and silver candelabra from the altars; bronze statues of heathen
idols and heroes, precious works of Hellenic art; crowns, coronets,
thrones, vessels of gold and silver; ornaments of diamonds, pearls,
and precious stones from the imperial treasury and the palaces of the
nobles; jewelry and precious metals from the shops of the goldsmiths;
silks, velvets and brocaded tissues from the warehouses of the
merchants, together with coined money, were accumulated in vast heaps
as spoils to be divided by the victors. A few of the crusading clergy
endeavored to moderate the fury which the bigoted prejudices of the
Latin Church had instilled into the minds of the soldiery against the
Greeks, but many priests were as forward as the most abandoned of the
troops in robbing the temples of a kindred faith.”[52]
Our Saviour’s words were literally fulfilled; with what measure the
Greeks so often had measured and dealt with the Armenian, it was meted
to them by the hands of the Crusaders; yet such a conduct of the
Crusaders with the Christian, and undoubtedly a conduct a good deal
worse than this towards Mohammedans, accounts for the determination
and fury of the latter against the Christians. The reply of Meleck
Nasr Mohmud, the Egyptian Sultan, to an application of the Armenian
king Leo V, for a treaty of peace was the following: “I will never make
peace with you until you promise on oath not to hold any correspondence
or communication with Western nations.” Often did the Mohammedan
powers imagine that the Armenians had again stirred up the Western
nations, that they were marching against them in greater forces than
ever before, and then they would attack the cities and towns of the
Armenians and commit all manner of atrocities, thinking that that might
be their last opportunity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account