Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent — John Shaqi
Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn IndependentFord, Henry
General
Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
On that frontier post (as West Point then was) there were no witnesses.
Franks and Varick were confronted with the necessity of testifying for
each other. That is, the Jewish major was his own representative in
court and practically his own witness. Franks put Varick on the stand to
testify for him, and Varick put Franks on the stand to testify for him.
The resulting testimony shows that Franks knew much and was eager to
tell how much he knew of Arnold’s traitorous intentions—but he did not
tell it until Arnold’s treason was exposed and he himself under arrest.
The purpose of this article being merely to fill up the gaps which are
left in the Jewish propagandist boasting of the part they have played in
public affairs in the United States, the reader must himself be a judge
as to how far Major David Solesbury Franks was in Arnold’s secret. (The
“Smith” mentioned in the testimony was Joshua Hett Smith, who did secret
work for Arnold and rowed André ashore for the night conference with
Arnold.) Following are vital extracts from the testimony:
Major Franks—“What was my opinion of Joshua H. Smith’s character and
conduct, and of his visits at Arnold’s headquarters...?”
Colonel Varick—“When I first joined Arnold’s family ... Arnold and
yourself thought well of him as a man, but I soon prevailed on you to
think him a Liar and a Rascal; and you ever after spoke of him in a
manner his real character merited....”
Arnold, of course, knew what Smith was. Arnold and Smith were already
partners in treason. But Varick did not know of this partnership. All
that Varick knew was that both Arnold and Franks appeared to hold the
same opinion, that Smith was all right. Here Arnold and Franks appear as
agreed again. Varick regarded them as holding the same opinion. Varick
says so to Franks’ face in answer to Franks’ question. He does it,
however, from a friendly purpose. But the fact is significant that
Franks and Arnold are found holding the same front—“Arnold and yourself
thought well of him as a man.”
Now, Arnold _knew_ what Smith was, knew enough about Smith to hang him.
Smith was one of the tools of his long extended treason. The question
is, did Franks also know? Was Franks kept in ignorance of Arnold’s real
knowledge of Smith, or was Franks actually deceived as regards Smith? It
may be, but let this be observed, that Varick, who was not at all in
Arnold’s confidence, nevertheless was not deceived about Smith, but saw
through him at once. Did not Franks see through him, too? Until the time
that Varick dared speak about the matter, Franks and Arnold were
preserving the same appearance of opinion—they “thought well of him as a
man.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account