Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn IndependentFord, Henry
General
Aspects of Jewish power in the United States $b : volume IV of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a fourth selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent
Ford, Henry
Antisemitic literature; Jews -- United States; United States -- Ethnic relations
It is the honest Varick talking, Franks questioning him. It will be
observed that it is Franks who tells Varick of Arnold’s absence and that
he will not return that night. Franks knew, but Varick did not. It will
be observed also, that it was Varick who protested and threatened to
quit Arnold. It was indeed the second time he had threatened to quit,
but the Jewish major seems never to have had a similar thought. But most
important to observe is Varick’s statement in answer to Franks, and in
Franks’ presence, that it was Franks who opened up with information
regarding Arnold’s character—that Arnold was an avaricious man, that
Franks suspected him of opening up trade with the enemy “under sanction
of his command” (just as he had planned to misuse his authority at
Philadelphia) and that Smith was to be the go-between. Then he mentions
a letter to “Anderson in a commercial style”—this “Anderson” being none
other than Major John André of the British Army.
Here we find Major Franks intimate with every element of the
conspiracy—every element of it!—and giving a certain explanation of it
to Varick. Did Franks know more than he told, and was he quieting Varick
with an explanation which seemed to cover all the facts, and yet did not
divulge the truth? It is a question that occurs, directly we recall the
close collusion of Arnold and Franks at Philadelphia.
There is other testimony, that it was Varick, not Franks, who prevented
Arnold selling supplies of the government for his own profit. Time and
again this occurred, but never with Franks, the long-time aid and
confidant of Arnold, in the role of actor. But every time Varick did it,
Franks knew of it, as he testified.
Now we approach the “Day of his Desertion,” as the records call the day
of Arnold’s treason.
Major Franks—“What was Arnold’s, as well as my conduct and
deportment on the Day of his Desertion, and had you the slightest
reason to think I had been or was party or privy to any of his
villainous practices and correspondence with the enemy, or to his
flight? Pray relate the whole of our conduct on that day to your
knowledge.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account