Attila and His Conquerors: A Story of the Days of St. Patrick and St. Leo the GreatCharles, Elizabeth Rundle
History
Attila and His Conquerors: A Story of the Days of St. Patrick and St. Leo the Great
Charles, Elizabeth Rundle
Attila, -453 -- Fiction; Christian fiction; Rome -- History -- Empire, 284-476 -- Fiction
“But ‘what of the Huns?’ perhaps you will ask. The Huns are some scores
of miles away at present, and we are safe in Lyons. I suppose near the
frontier they are so used to the roar of this advancing tide of the
barbarians that they cease to hear it, like people who live close to
a torrent, and only make their merriment a little louder to drown the
tumultuous noise. Besides, all the time some of us, and among these my
host, are doing what we can to keep off the Huns. Aetius is doing his
best to cement the alliance with the Gothic king Theodoric, and we hope
he is prospering.”
The next letter was from a country house near Arles.
“This villa reminds me of our palace on the Aventine. The vestibule
is full of statues. There are books in all kinds of ornamental cases.
The ladies read, and seem to love best the sacred Scriptures. At least
I found these on the chair where the young daughter of the house had
been sitting, a new copy of the Gospels in Jerome’s version. Also the
relations between the master and his hundreds of slaves are pleasant and
friendly.
“Moreover, I am more in touch with Sidonius Apollinaris, who brought
me here. I have seen him glow with a genuine passion of indignation
against an oppressive Roman governor, who seems to have been ruining his
district by exorbitant taxation, starving the labourers, grinding down
the farmers, filling the prisons with the wretched victims of the paid
informers—a worse invasion than that of the barbarians. I shall be able
to endure the tinsel of his panegyrics now that I have seen him burn with
a genuine fire against wrong.
“But I am perplexed about this Hilary, Metropolitan of Arles, who died
here not long since. The people seemed to think him such a saint, and to
be indignant with our Leo for supporting a bishop of his province against
his authority. Some say Leo is seeking to found a spiritual autocracy,
an empire to tower above patriarch or emperor, above all authorities,
ecclesiastical and secular.
“I cannot understand the rights of the controversy. Leo, of course,
feels intensely the necessity of unity. He has seen the ruin of the
African Church through its own divisions, and seen it become the prey
of the heretic Arians. He has seen the chilling of the temperature in
the Eastern Church through endless metaphysical discussions and secular
battles. He sees the whole Roman world crumbling into dust. And he
believes the Church itself, as far as the Church is in the world, must
crumble and fall if it is not kept at unity with itself. And also he
believes that he himself is the Heir and Vicar of Peter, the Prince of
the Apostles, and that he has to keep the Church one and indivisible
amidst the crash and crumbling of everything else. Is not this what he
means? Nevertheless it perplexes me about his dispute with the holy
Hilary of Arles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account