Aubrey Beardsley : $b the clown, the harlequin, the pierrot of his ageMacfall, Haldane
General
Aubrey Beardsley : $b the clown, the harlequin, the pierrot of his age
Macfall, Haldane
Beardsley, Aubrey, 1872-1898; Illustration of books -- Great Britain -- 19th century
Beardsley, feverishly as he had addressed himself to the _Salome_, as
we have seen, had no sooner made the drawings than he wearied of them
and sought for new worlds to conquer. It was about the New Year of
1894, the _Salome_ off his hands, that _The Yellow Book_ was planned in
detail, and Beardsley flung himself into the scheme with renewed fiery
ardour. The idea suited him better than any yet held out to him for the
expression of his individual genius; and his hand’s craft was beginning
to find personal expression. His mimicries and self-schooling were near
at an end. He flung the Japanesques of the _Salome_ into the wastepaper
basket of his career with as fine a sigh of relief as he had aforetime
flung aside the _Morte d’Arthur_ Kelmscott mediævalism. And he now
gave utterance to the life of the day as he saw it--through books--and
he created a decorative craftsmanship wherewith to do it, compact of
his intensely suggestive nervous and musical line in collusion with
flat black masses, just as he saw that the Greeks had done--employing
line and mass like treble and bass to each other’s fulfilment and
enhancement. His apprenticeship to firm line and solid blacks in the
_Morte d’Arthur_ now served him to splendid purpose. He was taking
subjects that would tickle or exasperate the man-in-the-street, who was
cold about the doings of the Court of Herod and indifferent to Japan
and The Knights of the Round Table. Interested in the erotic side of
social life, he naturally found his subjects in the half-world--he
took the blatant side of “life” as it was lived under the flare of
the electric lights of Piccadilly Circus, and the cafés thereabouts;
its powdered and painted and patchouli “romance” amused him more than
the solid and more healthy life of his day into which he had little
insight, and for which he had rather a contempt as judged from his
own set as being “middle-class” and unromantic. He scorned his own
class. But he had the right as artist to utter any emotional experience
whatsoever, the erotic as much as anything else--but we are coming to
that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account