Audubon the Naturalist: A History of His Life and Time. Vol. 2 (of 2)Herrick, Francis Hobart
History
Audubon the Naturalist: A History of His Life and Time. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Herrick, Francis Hobart
Audubon, John James, 1785-1851
Waterton maintained that Audubon's drawing of the rattlesnake, to which
we have referred, was a monstrosity, "a fabulous Hydra, with its eyes
starting out of their sockets," and a point repeatedly ridiculed was
his representation of the fangs as slightly recurved, or bent up at
their tips. Who had ever heard of such an anomaly? Certainly not the
doughty lord of "Walton Hall," who declared that the fangs of poisonous
snakes were always curved like a scythe, with their points bent
downwards. Waterton prided himself on his knowledge of these reptiles,
and certainly was not lacking in self-confidence. According to his own
account, he went eleven months in the forests of Brazil without shoe or
stocking to his foot, and on a certain occasion in London secured with
his hands and removed from its cage a live rattlesnake; but, like so
many sophisticated writers on natural history, he took to analogy like
a duck to water.
Waterton's statement sounds plausible enough, but obviously could be
proved only by extensive observations and comparisons. When Audubon
was proceeding up Galveston Bay to Houston, Texas, in the spring
of 1837, with his son, John, and Edward Harris, they stopped at the
plantation of Colonel James Morgan, near Red Fish Bar. "There, among
other rarities," said he, "we procured a fine specimen of the climbing
rattlesnake with _recurved_ fangs, which with several others of the
same kind, is now in my possession."[65] In writing to Thomas M.
Brewer, from Charleston, on June 12 of this year, he alluded to this
subject as follows: "I must not forget to say to you that I had the
good fortune to procure specimens of my 'Climbing Rattlesnake with
DOUBLE _recurved fangs_' which, I am told, will prove a new genus! and
therefore the Messrs. Ord and Waterton—_good souls!_—will be perfectly
delighted at the sight of this strange reptile."[66] Unfortunately
a large part of Audubon's collections made upon this expedition were
lost. I have seen no other reference to this extraordinary peculiarity,
and there the matter seems to have rested until the present time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account