this extension) have their jambs of chalk-blocks filled in with _white_ mortar, while the arches are turned in Roman bricks and rough voussoirs of Kentish rag-stone, with interstices of bright _pink_ mortar. These windows are certainly built _more Romano_, and no sufficient evidence has yet been brought forward to upset the opinion strongly held by many archæologists--that they are _Roman_. The variation of the mortar used in their construction from _white_ mortar in the jambs to _pink_ mortar in the voussoirs of the arch is a very noticeable feature, and can be exactly paralleled in the Roman Pharos at Dover. It is certainly _prima facie_, a strong evidence of Roman workmanship. The windows are 2 ft. 8 in. wide, and would have measured 4 ft. from sill to crown. Their jambs are splayed at an angle that would allow about 12 ins. for the actual opening on the outer face of the wall. Their sills are respectively 9 ft. 9 in. and 10 ft. above the ground level, and the lower portion of the south window is filled up with thin mediæval tiles, such as we find here and there in the fourteenth-century tower, during the building of which the _extended_ windows were undoubtedly blocked up. These _extended_ windows have no voussoirs, but were cut out of the original walling, and simply plastered. Near them are portions of pink plaster still adhering to the wall. Excavations have been made below the northern portion of this western wall in hopes of finding some of the original flooring of the church, but could not be further prosecuted because vaults, and even detached skeletons, were met with at a distance of only one foot below the existing pews.