Bibliographic Notes on One Hundred Books Famous in English LiteratureKent, Henry Watson
History
Bibliographic Notes on One Hundred Books Famous in English Literature
Kent, Henry Watson
Best books; English literature -- First editions -- Bibliography; English literature -- History and criticism
GEORGE CHAPMAN
(1559-1634)
15. The | Whole Works | Of | Homer; | Prince Of Poetts | In his
Iliads, and | Odyſses. | Translated according to the Greeke, | By
| Geo: Chapman. | De Ili: et Odiſſ. | Omnia ab, his: et in his
ſunt omnia | ſive beati | Te decor eloquij, | ſeu rer[~u] pondera
| tangunt. Angel: Pol: | At London printed for Nathaniell Butter.
| William Hole ſculp:
Though Butter was the publisher of Dekker's _Belman of
London_, and, with John Busby, of Shakespeare's _Lear_, he is
chiefly to be remembered for two things, for his success as a
compiler and publisher of pamphlets of news,--a success which
entitles him to the place of father of the London press--and
for his connection with Chapman.
In 1609 (?) Samuel Macham brought out, in small folio form,
_Homer, Prince of Poetts, in Twelve Bookes of his Iliads_,
embellished with an engraved title-page by William Hole, who
was one of the earliest English engravers on copper-plates.
Inflated with his subject, the artist crowded the title into
a small central panel the better to present his conception of
Vulcan, Apollo, Achilles, Hector, and Homer, in a composition
which, if topheavy, was more dignified and better drawn than
many of the borders ascribed to him.
Under date of April 8, 1611, we find in the Stationers'
Register that Butter "Entered for his Copy by consente of
Samuell Masham, A Booke called Homers Iliads in English
contayning 24 bookes." With his right to print, he also
received the right to use the Hole frontispiece, which he had
reëngraved on a larger scale for the new book. The date of
issue is not given, but it could not have been later than
November 6, 1612, the date of the death of the Prince of
Wales, to whom the book is dedicated, and it was probably
published soon after the date of copyright. The printer's name
is also lacking; but reasons exist for thinking that more than
one worked on the book, and that there were several issues.
There are copies whose signatures agree with those of the
volumes of our issue, but these are printed with different
type, on poorer paper, and the initial letters and other
ornaments are of a much cruder sort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account