Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
History
Bibliographical history of electricity & magnetism, chronologically arranged
Electricity -- History; Electricity -- History -- Bibliography; Magnetism -- History; Magnetism -- History -- Bibliography; Science, Medieval
REFERENCES.--For Lul. Raimon, or Raymundus, or Lullius
(1235–1315), “Dict. of Philos. and Psych.,” by J. M. Baldwin,
New York, 1902, Vol. II. p. 32; Humboldt, “Cosmos,” 1849, Vol.
II. pp. 629–631, 670, and 1859, Vol. V. p. 55; Miller, “Hist.
Phil. Ill.,” London, 1849, Vol. II. p. 217; Whewell, “Hist. Ind.
Sc.,” 1859, Vol. I. p. 169; also his “Phil. of the Ind. Sc.,”
London, 1840, Vol. II. pp. 320–323; “Journal des Savants,” 1896,
pp. 342, 345–355; “Biogr. Génér.,” article “Lulle”; Helfferich,
“Raym. L.,” Berlin, 1858; Nicolai Eymerici, “Direct Inq.,” Rome,
1578; Bolton, “Ch. Hist. of Chem.,” pp. 1000–1001; Ueberweg,
“Hist. of Philos.” (Morris’ translation, 1885), Vol. I. pp.
457, 459; “Lives of Alchemystical Philosophers,” by Arthur
Edward Waite, London, 1888, pp. 68–88, in which is given, at pp.
276–306, an alphabetical catalogue of all works on Hermetic
Philosophy and Alchemy; Humboldt, “Examen Critique,” Paris,
1836, Vol. I. pp. 7, 283.
For the Dominican Giordano (Jordano) Bruno, see “The Course of
the History of Modern Philosophy,” by Victor Cousin, New York,
1872, Vol. II. pp. 56–58; “English Cycl.” (Biography), Vol. I.
p. 979; Libri, “Hist. des Sc. Mathém.,” Paris, 1838, Vol. I. p.
141; “La Grande Encycl.,” Vol. VIII. pp. 258–259, reviewed in
the “London Athenæum,” Nov. 28, 1903, p. 711.
[Illustration: Vincent de Beauvais. “Speculum Naturale.”
Page taken from the 1473 copy, now in the Bibliothèque, Ste.
Geneviève, Paris.]
=A.D. 1250.=--Vincent de Beauvais, another Crusader, writes his
“Mirror of Nature” (“Bibliotheca Mundi, Speculum Majus, Speculum
Triplex”) for St. Louis and his consort, Marguerite de Provence, and
speaks therein of the polarity of the needle (“Speculi Naturalis,” Vol.
II. lib. ix. cap. 19). He cites Aristotle as having written a book,
“De Lapide,” containing a notice of the magnet’s use in navigation,
but none of Aristotle’s known works appear to have the passage given.
Cabæus and others rather judge that book to be the work of some Arabic
writer (Thomas Creech, “Lucretius”). Libri, however, says that a
translation or _abrégé_ of the MS. of “De Lapide” is at the Paris
Library--MSS. Arabes, No. 402 (“Hist. des sc. Mathém.,” Vol. I. p. 101).
Le Sieur Petrus Peregrinus de Maricourt (see A.D. 1269) alludes
clearly to the polarity of the needle in an epistle, “Ad Sigerum de
Foucaucourt--Fontancourt--militem de Magnete,” written toward the end
of the thirteenth century, and the magnet is, at about the same period,
referred to in the following lines of the minstrel Gauthier d’Espinois,
contemporary of the Count of Champagne, Thibaud VI, who lived before
the middle of the thirteenth century (“Hist. Lit. de la France,” 1856,
Vol. XXIII--chansonniers--pp. 576, 831):
“Tout autresi (ainsi) comme l’aimant déçoit (détourne)
L’aiguilette par force de vertu
A ma dame tot le mont (monde) retennue
Qui sa beauté connoit et aperçoit.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account