If we contemplate seriously the whole course of our foreign policy, in
so far as regards Italy, we cannot fail to be impressed with the idea
that the Whigs have given undue countenance to the late insurrectionary
movements. Great Britain might have come forward honourably at the
commencement of the Lombardy campaign to stop the effusion of blood and
the horrors of war, by the offer of a timely mediation; but no such step
was taken. On the contrary, our Cabinet remained quiescent and looked on
approvingly, so long as success appeared to favour the Sardinian arms:
it is only after the invader has been beaten back, and driven within the
frontiers of his own kingdom—after Austria has redeemed by force all her
Lombard territory, that Lord Palmerston, and his new ally Cavaignac,
have thought fit to tender their good offices. We may safely ask—what
good purpose can be achieved by this very late intervention? Who are the
parties whose quarrel is to be taken up? Mr D’Israeli put the matter
well when he asked,—First, what was to be the principle of this
mediation; secondly, what was to be the motive of the mediation; and
thirdly, what was the end proposed to be attained by the mediation? The
motive, we are assured, is the preservation of peace, and we fully
subscribe to its importance; but on all other matters we are left as
thoroughly in the dark as ever. Really this mystery is, to say the least
of it, tantalising; and we would fain know whether Austria is the party
who has taken the initiative, in securing the advice of two peace-makers
like Palmerston and Cavaignac. Austria has recovered the possessions
guaranteed her by the faith of the leading states of Europe, has put
down insurrection, and driven back in rout and terror the invading
Sardinian over his own frontier. There remains no body of her revolted
subjects in a position to ask for mediation. As for Charles Albert, he
is not, we presume, either King of Italy or Lord of Lombardy, neither
have we heard of any other claim, save that of sympathy, which could
entitle him to enter into the contest. Personally he had no wrong to
avenge; but having chosen to espouse the cause of the rebels, and to
encounter the risks of war, he is surely not entitled, especially after
defeat, to insist upon any conditions. If Austria shall choose, of her
own free will and accord, to cede possession of Lombardy, it will be a
mere act of grace, which cannot be demanded from her by any state in
Europe. But she is clearly entitled to dictate, and not to receive
conditions; and any interference with her guaranteed and fully recovered
rights, either on the part of England or of France, would be tantamount
to a declaration of war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account