Blood and Iron: Origin of German Empire As Revealed by Character of Its Founder, BismarckGreusel, John Hubert
History
Blood and Iron: Origin of German Empire As Revealed by Character of Its Founder, Bismarck
Greusel, John Hubert
Bismarck, Otto, Fürst von, 1815-1898; Germany -- History -- 1789-1900
There was bad blood over principles and procedure, policies and plans.
To transform aloofness to neighborliness, tumult to conciliation,
quarreling to friendliness, hostility to good will, dissent must give
way to assent, distrust to faith, denial to admission, misgiving to
conviction, political atheism to political revelation.
Such are some of the peculiarities of the human animal; and in
political life human animals are prone to fight for self-interest,
like dogs over a bone.
* * * * *
¶ We are not going to try to tell you of the many efforts by rash
reformers, in the half-century of the dead-weight, leading to the rise
of Prussia.
Again and again, far-sighted Germans, sick unto death at the way
things were going, urged equality for all men before the law, equal
taxation, restriction of the power of the nobles.
Strange as it may seem, the peasants themselves stood in the way. They
did not care to change their condition, miserable as it was. They
dreaded the future, preferred present miseries than to risk new ills.
For example, on one occasion, a certain political idealist excited the
peasants in revolt, assassinated 120 nobles, destroyed 264 castles.
This was in the time of Joseph II, of Austria, the ruler filled with
amazing ideas of equality. The peasants themselves were the first to
protest, much as they detested the nobles; and the unsupported leaders
died on the wheel, while 150 miserable followers were buried alive.
And yet, at that very moment, the idealistic Joseph, who with an
excess of zeal, tried for political equality, made enemies of his
nobles, enemies of his peasants, likewise. The great reformer was held
a fanatic, intent on destroying government. Too far ahead of his time,
his plans for political semi-equality failed.
¶ This monarch, thinking to make a lesson, had swindling nobles placed
in the stocks, like common thieves.
Joseph was one of the first great democrats, in the modern sense. To
him, the cause of the common man was sacred. He believed in genuine
equality, but alas, he did not know how to bring about the political
Millennium.
¶ He threw open the parks to the people; he proclaimed free speech and
free thought; he abolished serfdom; he labored to construct a
state-machine with one system of justice and one National plan.
Joseph, though overbrimming with emotions for the common man's
political salvation, failed to allow for the ignorance of his people,
their stubborn avowal of local self-interests.
¶ And it fell out that his people thought that Joseph was trying to
enslave them the more; ingratitude and misapprehensions followed,
destroying the liberal reformer's most cherished plans for his beloved
Austria-Germany.
The word was passed alone that Joseph was a tyrant. You see, as
frequently happens, the people preferred old abuses to new ways. The
general population hugged their chains and refused to be delivered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account