The appearance of the different groups can now be further explained
in terms of the Mendelian theory. According to the conception of the
individual formulated by Mendel, each cell of the body contains an
ingredient derived from each of the sexual cells or gametes which
united at the moment of fertilization of the ovum by the spermatozoon
to form the individual. But when the adult in his or her turn forms
sexual cells or gametes, these ingredients separate again, half the
gametes containing one of the pair of factors, half containing the
other. This process certainly takes place during the rearrangement
of the nuclear substance or chromosomes at the cell divisions which
result in the formation of the ripe sexual cells. It is called the
“segregation of the gametes.”
In the present case the unit character producing Group II will be
first considered. As already explained, the factors concerned may be
called A and a, and the individual of Group II may be constituted by
AA or Aa, and the gametes, therefore, may contain either A or a, but
not both. The individuals resulting from the union of the gametes
derived from Aa adults may then be constituted in three ways--AA,
Aa, or aa. Similarly for the unit character producing Group III,
the factors concerned may be called B and b, and the individual of
this group may contain BB or Bb. The gametes then contain either B
or b, and the individual resulting from their union may again be
constituted in three ways--BB, Bb, or bb.
In computing the results, however, it must be remembered that most,
or perhaps all, people are hybrids, so that both unit characters
are present simultaneously, and all the factors must be taken into
account. It is easily seen that the gametes derived from a hybrid
individual must contain one of the following combinations:
AB, Ab, aB, or ab,
and consequently the individuals formed from them must have one of
the following constitutions:
AB--Ab, Ab--aB, aB--ab, ab--ab, AB--AB,
AB--aB, Ab--ab, aB--aB,
AB--ab, Ab--Ab.
This includes all the possible combinations that can result from the
chance union of the gametes, and it is now clear which blood groups
result from which combinations, if it be remembered that
A is dominant to a,
B ” ” ” b,
and that
Group I results from the _presence_ of both A and B.
” II ” ” ” ” ” A only.
” III ” ” ” ” ” B ”
” IV ” ” ” _absence_ ” both A and B.
Thus Group I may be constituted by AB--AB.
AB--aB.
AB--Ab.
AB--ab.
Ab--aB.
Group II may be constituted by Ab--Ab.
Ab--ab.
” III ” ” ” ” ab--aB.
aB--aB.
” IV ” ” ” ” ab--ab.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account