1563. “Rudimenta Fidei Christianæ; addita est ecclesiasticarum precum formula; Græc. Lat.” 12mo. This is Calvin’s Catechism, translated into Greek by Henry himself. “De abusu linguæ Græcæ in quibusdem vocibus, quas Latina usurpat admonitio.” 8vo. Of this treatise Henry was author as well as publisher. 1564. “Fragmenta Pœtarum Veterum Latinorum, quorum opera non extant, Ennii, Accii, Lucilii” etc. This work was undertaken out of regard for the memory of his father, by whom the fragments had been collected, but who had not been able to complete the preparation of them for the press. 1566. “La confirmation de la discipline ecclésiastique observée dans les églises réformées du royaume de France; avec la résponse aux objections proposées à l’encontre.” This was printed in Geneva. In the same year, was issued a Greek _Anthology_ to which the publisher added certain annotations of his own. By way of exciting the emulation of young poets, Henry promised an addition of such Greek epigrams as had been turned into Latin metre by himself and others, and as a proof of his own facility, he introduced into his annotations to the _Anthology_ above mentioned more than fifty translations of a single distich. The publisher, in thus assuming responsibilities as an author, could, of course, not escape the criticism of other authors claiming authority in the same studies. Vavasseur, for instance, says of Henry’s literary productions: “His verse is more faulty than his prose, his numbers are harsh and unpolished, his muse is often triflingly diffuse. He is fluent in writing, but frequently not correct. He is both fastidious and dictatorial, talking freely of others and much of himself, and forgetting the modesty which becomes the author.”[28] It is fair to remember that Father Vavasseur was a Jesuit and was possibly, therefore, no dispassionate judge of the defects of the scholarly but heretical publisher. 1566. “Herodoti Historiæ Libri IX. et de vita Homeri Libellus, Latine. Folio.” This edition comprises also the _Opuscula_ of Herodotus, Plutarch, and Porphyrius, relating to Homer’s life and poesy. M. de Sallengre relates that Henry Estienne, having printed at a great expense the histories of Herodotus, his enemies and above all the monks, who sought every occasion to bring trouble upon him, decried his history as filled with fables _et de contes à dormir debout_, and that Henry, to repel the effect of this accusation, undertook to justify himself by the composition of the following treatise, _Apologia pro Herodoto, sive Herodoti Historia fabulositatis accusata_.