Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
History
Brave British soldiers and the Victoria Cross: a general account of the regiments and men of the British Army, and stories of the brave deeds which won the prize "for valour"
Great Britain -- History, Military -- 19th century; Great Britain. Army -- Biography; Soldiers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Victoria Cross
“Tonald Mactonald No. 6; that’s my sister’s son frae Achallatus. Ay, ay,
Tonald; she was aye a modest lad, that never spak’ till she was spoken
to, so we’ll put her down present.”
And thus the sergeant went over the whole roll, accompanying each name
with some remark which showed the estimation in which he held the bearer.
The soldiers of all these regiments wore the scarlet jacket and
waistcoat, with a tartan plaid, the lower part of which was wrapped round
the body, and the upper thrown loosely over the left shoulder. The plaid
served a double purpose: it guarded the soldier’s shoulders and firelock
from rain by day, and was used as a blanket by night. It was attached to
his middle by a belt, from which his pistol and dirk, or small dagger,
were suspended. On his head was worn the blue bonnet with a border of
tartan as at the present day, and a small tuft of feathers or a piece of
bearskin; the kilt was of different colours to distinguish the regiments.
The arms were supplied by government, and consisted of a musket, a
bayonet, and a large basket-hilted broadsword. In 1769 some alteration
was made in the dress of the 42nd; the men were provided with white cloth
waistcoats, and goatskin and buff leather purses; the officers began to
wear light hangers instead of the heavy broadsword, which was used only
in full dress; and the sergeants were provided with carbines, and laid
aside the ponderous Lochaber axes they had hitherto carried. In 1776 the
broadswords and pistols were laid aside. The regiment was then serving in
America, and it was objected that the broadswords impeded their movements
by getting entangled in the brushwood. An attempt was subsequently made
to induce them to dispense with the kilt, and to adopt the garb of the
Saxon. It was objected to it then, as now, that it was too hot in summer
and too cold in winter; but the Highlanders stood out stoutly against the
proposed innovation, and the notion of changing the kilt was abandoned.
“We were allowed,” writes a veteran son of the Gael, “to wear the garb of
our fathers, and, in the course of six winters, showed the doctors that
they did not understand our constitution; for in the coldest winters our
men were more healthy than those regiments who wore breeches and warm
clothing.” But now that the kilt is no longer worn in the Highlands, and
few Highlanders enlist in the kilted regiments, it seems an anomaly to
retain an article of dress which, we venture to say, was never worn by
nineteen-twentieths of our present soldiers till they entered the army.
A large proportion of the officers are English, and it is rather hard
that they should have to adopt a dress which must strike them at first
as barbarous, if not indecent. It is singular, however, that Englishmen
serving in Highland regiments are usually as fond of the kilt as the
Highlanders themselves, and would be quite as ready to protest against
the adoption of a less peculiar costume.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account