A universe such as this, consisting entirely of relation values without
residue, would be one huge process of compensation, an endlessly
diversified fall from positions of higher to positions of lower
tension. It is just this mode of representation which makes it possible
for the physicist to calculate, to determine in advance. He cannot set
about this his work at all until first after such a fashion he has
given a new interpretation to the play of world-events. He must also,
in similar wise, mechanise the invisible matter of the molecules,
before he can master, so far as calculation goes, what takes place
internally. In thought, one must loosen the existing connection between
the molecules in order to be able to establish the internal falls. It
is here as it is in a minuet: one takes a step backward in order to be
able to take a step forward!
But this is what the physicist dares to do. All he is concerned about
is to calculate, measure, determine in advance. As a general rule he
not only says, “_Après nous le déluge_,” but also “_Avant nous le
déluge_.” He rejoices in his power of being able to interpret and make
use of the re-actual play of world-events to suit his own ends, and for
the rest does not care a straw whence this power comes or whither in
the future it may go. _He does not think: he only works._
Now, so long as he preserves as physicist an attitude of strict
impartiality towards this universe, the attitude of simple spectator,
he may reach by calculation, by technique, whatever so is reachable.
He stands before his universe as before an open piece of clock-work in
which with increasing accuracy he observes the style and manner of its
running and formulates the laws of the same. If, however, he allows
himself to be led away into working at a world-view, into putting the
question “Where will this clock-work run to?” he cuts the ground from
under his own feet.
For in such a universe there remains as actuating impulsion nothing but
the distinctions given with the separate processes. It is just like a
pendulum ever hastening on towards a condition of rest.
Now, since under the assumption in question--a universe as a closed
system--an influx of force from without is excluded, what we have here
is a process of mutual borrowing, so to speak, and cosmic bankruptcy is
only a question of time.
This logical necessity is taken account of by science in her entropy
concept--the concept of the whole universe as a process hastening
towards equilibrium, though that consummation be distant by millions of
years.
Therewith, however--presuming that she is honest--science stands
confronted by the following question:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account