Burmah and the BurmeseMackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
History
Burmah and the Burmese
Mackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
Burma -- Civilization; Burma -- History
particularly as, from the closeness of the air, I might have been rather
unpleasantly situated.”
This same officer saw another such structure on the plain of Pagahm,
among the ruins; but finding that it was used as a robber’s cavern, he
did not explore it. From what he could see, it was larger, and in better
repair.
The priests of Burmah[121] are named Pongyees, meaning “great example,”
or “great glory.” The Pali name, “Rahan,” or “holy man,” once so much in
use among them, is now almost obsolete. The office is not hereditary, for
the Burmans are unshackled by castes; and, indeed, a priest may become a
layman again, though after re-entering society he may not again assume
the sacerdotal position. Thus the convents of Burmah serve as a place
where an education superior to that usually obtained in the schools may
be received, and the young man, not being bound by any vow, may return
to the active scenes of life, and take military or political rank. If
the youth find the peaceful pursuits of the convent more to his taste,
he can remain, and become a priest. The system of the priesthood is not
badly managed. The Burmans have no church-rates, and pluralism, not being
worth anything, is, of course, unknown. The priests have no political
influence, and are only consulted on ecclesiastical and literary matters;
they live on the charity of their parishioners, and, on the whole, they
do not appear to be badly off.
The ritual, for which I must refer the reader to my frequently quoted
authority Sangermano,[122] is very strict in regard to priests; that,
however, is of no consequence, for in the foul and corrupted Burmese
empire all these institutions have fallen into disrepute. The priests
live as those of the convents of the middle ages did; and the similarity
between the Roman Catholic and Buddhist ceremonies, so amply proved by
MM. Huc and Gabet,[123] extends equally to the men.
Their dress is of a yellow colour, and is formed by two cloths, which are
so wrapped around them as to completely envelop them from the shoulders
to the heels. Their heads are shaved, and to shade the bare poll from the
burning sun, they carry a talipot or palmyra-leaf in their hands. In M.
Dubois de Jancigny’s Indo-Chine, and in Malcom, there are plates of the
dress, which convey a very tolerable idea of the look of a priest out
walking.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account