Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
Briefly put, at the crisis in the fortune of the new learning in
Europe, when the struggle was at its sharpest between ignorance and
enlightenment, the vindication of the Talmud became identified with
the overthrow of intellectual bigotry. Pfefferkorn wished to burn the
Talmud. He was a shady character, and from his first condition as a
bad Jew became, in Erasmus’ phrase, a worse Christian (“ex scelerato
Judaeo sceleratissimus Christianus”). Pfefferkorn hurled against his
former coreligionists the usual missiles of abuse. Why is it that the
converted Jew is so often a bitter assailant of Judaism? Some answer
that it is because the renegade must prove that he forsook something
execrable. Others would have it that intrinsic vileness of character is
responsible. But is it not more probable that apostate virulence is due
simply to ignorance? And this is the more obnoxious when the animosity
takes the form of an attack on literature. “Ignorance, which in matters
of morals extenuates the crime, is itself, in matters of literature,
a crime of the first order.” So said Joubert, and the remark can be
freely illustrated from the Pfefferkorns. When a real scholar leaves
the synagogue, he is rarely among the anti-Semites. Daniel Chwolson and
Paul Cassel in their career as Judæo-Christians were champions of the
Jewish cause against such very libels as a Pfefferkorn would circulate.
At the beginning of the sixteenth century the defence of Judaism was in
equally scholarly hands.
But it was not on Jews, whether by race or religion, that reliance
was then placed. Reuchlin--as all the world knows--saw no reason why
the Talmud should be condemned, and he expressed his opinion in clear
terms. Reuchlin, be it remembered, was the most learned German of his
age. “By a singular combination of taste and talents this remarkable
man excelled at once as a humanist and a man of affairs, as a jurist
and a mystic, and, above all, as a pioneer among Orientalists, so that
it has been said of him, enthusiastically but not unjustly, that he was
the ‘first who opened the gates of the East, unsealed the Word of God,
and unveiled the sanctuary of Hebrew wisdom.’” (This sentence is quoted
from the Introduction to Mr. Francis Griffin Stokes’ admirable Latin
and English edition of the _Letters_, to which I cordially commend
my readers.) Pfefferkorn rallied to his side the whole force of the
Dominican organization. The issue was long uncertain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account