Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
An aristocrat all his life, Guarini was out of place in the court life
of Ferrara. He spent his vigor in a vain attempt to accommodate himself
to the sixteenth century Italian conditions. Then, broken in strength
and fortune, he retired to produce his dramatic masterpiece. Not that
the _Pastor Fido_ can be truly termed dramatic. It is much more of a
lyric. But just as Banquo, himself no king, was the father of kings, so
Guarini, of little consequence as a dramatist, begot famous dramas. For
the _Faithful Shepherd_ deeply influenced European drama throughout the
two centuries which followed its publication in 1590.
The Hebraic muse owed much to Guarini. Moses Hayyim Luzzatto
(1707-1747) has been the only writer of Hebrew plays whose work counts
in the literary sense. Luzzatto derived his whole dramatic inspiration
from Guarini. Let no one question this assertion without first
comparing _La-Yesharim Tehillah_ and _Migdal ‘Oz_ with the _Pastor
Fido_. The characters and scenes, and even more, the style, are closely
alike. Nor is this latter fact wonderful. John Addington Symonds
describes Guarini’s work as “a masterpiece of diction, glittering and
faultless, like a bas-relief of hard Corinthian bronze.” Luzzatto
produces the same effect in his Hebrew imitation, using a similar
metre as well as similar dramatic conventions. In imitating, however,
he re-interprets. Guarini’s play is sometimes gross, it is never
truly rustic. But a Hebrew poet, moved by such models as the Song of
Songs, better knew how to be sensuous with purity; grossness must be
antipathetic to him. On the other hand, Hebrew poetry is genuinely
rustic. The biblical shepherd, whether in scriptural history or
romance, is the most beloved of heroes. Some of the great characters of
the Bible are shepherds: Abraham, Moses, David, Amos, Shulammith--but
why pile up instances? It is obvious that a Hebrew poet, adopting
a rural background for a lyrical drama, must inevitably write with
sincerity. He could not, at the same time, fail to write with delicacy.
Luzzatto took much from Guarini, but he both refined and adorned what
he borrowed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account