Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 309: New Series, Saturday, December 8, 1849Various
General
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 309: New Series, Saturday, December 8, 1849
Various
Periodicals
world comes out with railway schemes. It is opposition which engenders
expense; and a mania is the hotbed for the raising of opposition. One
of our railway companies had to fight so hard for their bill, that
they found, when at length they reached the last stage--namely, that
of receiving the royal assent--that their parliamentary expenses had
mounted up to half a million of money. Half a million of money spent
in barely acquiring from parliament the _right_ of making a line of
railway which is to confer a benefit on the nation! Such is the fact.
Without opposition, the same bill would have been passed into an act at
a cost not worth naming by the side of that enormous sum.'
The result of all this was, that the cost of constructing railways
went far beyond what was warranted by prospects of traffic; and in
point of fact, had the traffic not turned out to be greater than was
contemplated by the projectors, scarcely a railway in the country
would ever have paid a shilling of profit. The usual expense of
construction and putting in working order--all outlays included--was
L.30,000 to L.40,000 per mile; some lines were executed at L.20,000
per mile; but in several instances the cost was as high as L.300,000
per mile. The mere parliamentary expenses of some lines were L.5000
per mile; and a railway got well off at L.1000 per mile for expenses
of this nature. But the primary cost of railways is only one element
of calculation as respects the chances of profit: another large item
is the expense of working. It is now discovered that a railway cannot
be worked, to be at all efficient, under the present heavy locomotive
system, at a less cost than L.700 per mile per annum. 'Several branch
lines owned by wealthy companies,' says Herapath, 'do not receive
more than L.500 per mile per annum, while the expense of working them
cannot be less than L.700 per mile per annum. Here the loss is L.200
per mile per annum in addition to the loss of the capital expended' for
construction. 'The [present] locomotive railway system is of too costly
a character to admit of every town having its railway. It is too costly
in _working_ as well as in _construction_. A vast number of places have
not traffic sufficient to support railways, though the capital cost of
them should be nothing. The working of trains is too expensive to allow
of any profit being derived from the traffic conveyed.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account