Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
His power, then, lay in the fact that he expressed with an energy and
brilliancy quite uncommon the things close to the common mind. But with
this mere phrase, the common mind, we collide with a current error.
Commonness and the common mind are now generally spoken of as meaning
in some manner inferiority and the inferior mind; the mind of the mere
mob. But the common mind means the mind of all the artists and heroes;
or else it would not be common. Plato had the common mind; Dante had
the common mind; or that mind was not common. Commonness means the
quality common to the saint and the sinner, to the philosopher and the
fool; and it was this that Dickens grasped and developed. In everybody
there is a certain thing that loves babies, that fears death, that
likes sunlight: that thing enjoys Dickens. And everybody does not mean
uneducated crowds; everybody means everybody: everybody means Mrs.
Meynell. This lady, a cloistered and fastidious writer, has written
one of the best eulogies of Dickens that exist, an essay in praise
of his pungent perfection of epithet. And when I say that everybody
understands Dickens I do not mean that he is suited to the untaught
intelligence. I mean that he is so plain that even scholars can
understand him.
The best expression of the fact, however, is to be found in noting
the two things in which he is most triumphant. In order of artistic
value, next after his humour, comes his horror. And both his humour and
his horror are of a kind strictly to be called human; that is, they
belong to the basic part of us, below the lowest roots of our variety.
His horror for instance is a healthy churchyard horror, a fear of the
grotesque defamation called death; and this every man has, even if he
also has the more delicate and depraved fears that come of an evil
spiritual outlook. We may be afraid of a fine shade with Henry James;
that is, we may be afraid of the world. We may be afraid of a taut
silence with Maeterlinck; that is, we may be afraid of our own souls.
But every one will certainly be afraid of a Cock Lane Ghost, including
Henry James and Maeterlinck. This latter is literally a mortal fear,
a fear of death; it is not the immortal fear, or fear of damnation,
which belongs to all the more refined intellects of our day. In a
word, Dickens does, in the exact sense, make the flesh creep; he does
not, like the decadents, make the soul crawl. And the creeping of the
flesh on being reminded of its fleshly failure is a strictly universal
thing which we can all feel, while some of us are as yet uninstructed
in the art of spiritual crawling. In the same way the Dickens mirth is
a part of man and universal. All men can laugh at broad humour, even
the subtle humourists. Even the modern _flâneur_, who can smile at a
particular combination of green and yellow, would laugh at Mr. Lammle’s
request for Mr. Fledgeby’s nose. In a word--the common things are
common--even to the uncommon people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account