Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
This balance of all the
sensibilities we call sense; and it is in this capacity that it becomes
of great importance as an attribute of the character of Dickens.
Dickens, I repeat, had common sense and uncommon sensibility. That is
to say, the proportion of interests in him was about the same as that
of an ordinary man, but he felt all of them more excitedly. This is a
distinction not easy for us to keep in mind, because we hear to-day
chiefly of two types, the dull man who likes ordinary things mildly,
and the extraordinary man who likes extraordinary things wildly. But
Dickens liked quite ordinary things; he merely made an extraordinary
fuss about them. His excitement was sometimes like an epileptic fit;
but it must not be confused with the fury of the man of one idea
or one line of ideas. He had the excess of the eccentric, but not
the defects, the narrowness. Even when he raved like a maniac he did
not rave like a monomaniac. He had no particular spot of sensibility
or spot of insensibility: he was merely a normal man minus a normal
self-command. He had no special point of mental pain or repugnance,
like Ruskin’s horror of steam and iron, or Mr. Bernard Shaw’s permanent
irritation against romantic love. He was annoyed at the ordinary
annoyances: only he was more annoyed than was necessary. He did not
desire strange delights, blue wine or black women with Baudelaire, or
cruel sights east of Suez with Mr. Kipling. He wanted what a healthy
man wants, only he was ill with wanting it. To understand him, in
a word, we must keep well in mind the medical distinction between
delicacy and disease. Perhaps we shall comprehend it and him more
clearly if we think of a woman rather than a man. There was much that
was feminine about Dickens, and nothing more so than this abnormal
normality. A woman is often, in comparison with a man, at once more
sensitive and more sane.
This distinction must be especially remembered in all his quarrels.
And it must be most especially remembered in what may be called his
great quarrel with America, which we have now to approach. The whole
matter is so typical of Dickens’s attitude to everything and anything,
and especially of Dickens’s attitude to anything political, that I may
ask permission to approach the matter by another, a somewhat long and
curving avenue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account