Charles Peace, or The Adventures of a Notorious BurglarAnonymous
General
Charles Peace, or The Adventures of a Notorious Burglar
Anonymous
Burglars -- England -- London -- Biography; Murderers -- England -- London -- Biography; Peace, Charles Frederick, 1832-1879
He did not care about breakfast or tea. He liked being fed once a day,
like the lions in a menagerie, or the bull terriers in the mews.
His anxiety was great to see what his hot dinner was. It happened to
be a soup day; and his disgust on finding that he was to dine off a
little thin broth and a piece of bread defies description.
He entreated the warder, in the sweetest tones his rough voice could
command, to bring him something better than that.
The warder only laughed at him.
From entreaties he passed to threats, and from threats to a savage
blow with his fist, which would have annihilated the jocund official
had he not parried it with the iron door, which rang beneath the
shock, and covered the brawny hand with blood.
He howled with pain, and stretched himself on his bed in sulky
silence.
After this he became a little more tractable; contenting himself with
grumbling at everything that was brought him.
His sister paid him a visit. She informed him that she had obtained
some money towards paying counsel for his defence.
Upon hearing this he seemed greatly pleased; despite his recklessness
and bravado, he had become sad and serious as the time for the opening
of the assizes approached.
He still clung to hope, even as a drowning man might cling to a spar.
At length the day arrived on which the trial had been appointed to
take place. The facts connected with the charge of murder were simple
enough.
Jane Ryan, who had become by this time a sort of heroine, was the
chief witness; but there were others who were to be called as
witnesses for the Crown, who to a great extent could corroborate her
evidence.
Jane, when placed in the box, was calm and self-possessed.
She swore most positively to the prisoner as being the man who stabbed
James Hopgood. She averred that she had a distinct and vivid
recollection of every minute circumstance attendant upon the crime
committed on that fatal night.
The counsel for the defence by a series of cross questions and
inuendoes, strove to throw a doubt upon her testimony.
But Jane never wavered for a moment. Her answers were clear and
concise. Every word she uttered bore the impress of truth.
Her cross-examination was continued for so long a time that it became
wearisome.
There was, of course, the usual wrangling between the advocates as to
what was admissible as evidence.
Objections were taken to some of the questions put to the witnesses,
and an appeal was made to the judge, who overruled certain objections,
and admitted others.
Jane’s former master and her fellow-servant were the next. They both
swore positively to the prisoner as the same person who stabbed the
young carpenter.
Eight other witnesses were examined, amongst whom were the two Messrs.
Ashbrook and the policemen.
The weight of evidence was clearly against the prisoner, and after
retiring for a short time the jury returned a “Verdict of Guilty,”
upon the charge of wilful murder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account