“Bold champion of the Right! We welcome thee to-night With heartfelt song: Once Freedom’s tyrant foe Essayed to lay thee low, But now we joy to know That thou art strong. “Life’s purpose to fulfil, Stand thou defiant still, While life remains: For Thraldom’s night will flee, Our children yet shall see The land redeemed and free From Slavery’s chains. “Faithful and vigilant! To thee our song we chant: Good night! Good night! Around thy couch be peace, From pain may sleep release, And strength with years increase! Good night! Good night!” MODERATION IN VICTORY; STANDING BY OUR PRINCIPLES. SPEECH TO THE WIDE-AWAKES OF LOWELL, NOVEMBER 21, 1860. In the evening after his lecture at Lowell, Mr. Sumner was escorted by the Wide-Awakes, with banners and lights, to the house of Hon. John Nesmith, whose guest he was. On arrival there, he thanked his escort in these words:-- WIDE-AWAKES AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:-- I owe my best thanks for the escort with which you honor me. But I must say frankly that I attribute it less to any merit of my own than to your zeal for the good cause in which I have borne a part. In our recent triumph the Wide-Awakes have rendered conspicuous service. The light which they have carried, I trust, is symbolical of that which, under the new Administration, will be directed upon the dark places of Government, while their activity and promptitude furnish an example which all may be proud to follow. The Republican party has prevailed. Its success is the triumph not only of Freedom, but also of the Constitution, long perverted to the purposes of Slavery. Nothing is clearer than this. The Republican party is not _aggressive_, but _conservative_. Its object is to carry the Government back to the original policy of the Fathers. Pardon me, but I never tire of reminding my fellow-citizens, that, when Washington took his first oath as President, the Constitution nowhere on the land, within the national jurisdiction, covered a slave; and surely the Republican party cannot err, if it seeks to bring back the condition of things under Washington. Bear this in mind, if you please; and when it is said that you are aggressive, reply fearlessly, “Then is the Constitution aggressive, then was Washington aggressive.” With these two authorities we cannot hesitate. To all enemies we oppose “the Constitution and Washington.” If attacks upon the Republican party here at home have caused a different impression in any quarter, the responsibility belongs to those who have constantly and systematically maligned and misrepresented us. And our severity of judgment should be reserved less for the Southern States so much excited than for those at the North who feed the flames.