Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)Sumner, Charles
History
Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20)
Sumner, Charles
Slavery -- United States; Speeches, addresses, etc., American
It seems clear, then, that the Japanese line, in order to be effective,
and to accomplish what is so much desired, must be left to itself,
without being obliged to turn aside for any incidental purpose. It must
be a Japanese line, and nothing else; and you must not forget, that,
just in proportion as you impose upon it any additional obligations,
you will impair its efficiency as one of the splendid links of commerce
destined to put a girdle round the globe.
I am ready, therefore, to release the Japanese line from stopping at
the Sandwich Islands; but at the same time I declare my hope that some
other means will be found to secure a line to these islands.
In releasing the Company from this service, I am willing to leave to
them the full subsidy already appropriated; but I think they should be
held to shorten their voyage in proportion to the time gained. This
provision will remove an objection which has been made.
The joint resolution, as amended, passed the Senate,--Yeas
24, Nays 15,--but it was not considered in the House of
Representatives. At the next session a bill became a law,
authorizing the establishment of ocean mail steamship service
between the United States and the Hawaiian Islands.[40]
TENNESSEE NOT SUFFICIENTLY RECONSTRUCTED.
SPEECH IN THE SENATE, ON A JOINT RESOLUTION DECLARING TENNESSEE AGAIN
ENTITLED TO SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS, JULY 21, 1866.
The Senate considered a joint resolution from the House of
Representatives “declaring Tennessee again entitled to Senators
and Representatives in Congress,” for which a substitute was
reported by Mr. Trumbull, of Illinois, from the Judiciary
Committee. The joint resolution from the House and the proposed
substitute each had a preamble. In the debate, Mr. Sumner
said:--
MR. PRESIDENT,--The question, as I understand it, is between two
preambles. I agree with my friend from Illinois, that the preamble
reported by him in many respects has the advantage of that from the
House. It is fuller, and in its structure better. I am glad it sets
forth how Tennessee lost her representation here, and also how she may
again be rehabilitated. But, while according merit to the Senator’s
preamble in that respect, there are other particulars in which it
fails. He himself has already recognized that it is no better than that
of the House, when it sets forth that
“the body of the people of Tennessee have, by a proper spirit
of obedience, shown to the satisfaction of Congress the return
of said State to due allegiance to the Government, laws, and
authority of the United States.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account