That night he pawned his watch for all it would bring. This put him in
funds again, but gave him pause. He decided to stop gambling and go to
work. But the morning paper contained a tempting list of entries. It
was Saturday, and a short day.
He went to the track as usual, and at the end of the third race was
"broke." Then he met Murray Jameson. Both were surprised. Checkers
told him his story, and borrowed ten dollars. Murray lost fifty more
by playing Checkers' tips, against his own better judgment. Murray was
"sore"--Checkers apologetic. This was his first experience as a tout.
After that he picked up a precarious living, selling whatever articles
of value he possessed, one after another, until he had left but the
diamond star he had given Pert as a wedding gift, and a scanty wardrobe.
When necessity caused him to part with the star he forswore the races,
and for two full weeks conscientiously sought for legitimate
employment. But Chicago was filled with idle hands, which the closing
of the Fair months before had left there stranded. Everything was
overcrowded. Business was dead, and his search was unavailing. Then
he took up "touting" as a profession. He rotated between the various
"merry-go-rounds," which were open all seasons of the year. The tout's
stock devices--the "bank-roll" game, the "phoney" ticket, the "jockey's
cousin"--he worked with better success than most; but, as a rule, his
method was simple. He sought the acquaintance of such as he thought
might be "persuaded," and by showing confidence where they were
doubtful, knowledge where their own was lacking, he usually managed to
get some four or five men to make bets during the day. Those who won
were grateful, and generally paid him well for his "information." The
losers got an explanation of "how it was" and "a sure thing for the
next."
One thing, however, must be said for Checkers. He never "touted" a
horse unless he thought it had a best chance of winning. That is, if
there were five horses in a race, and Checkers had five men "on his
string," he never descended to the common practice of getting each one
of the five to bet on a different horse, and thus "land a sure winner."
All five were certain to have the same chance, and to stand or fall
upon Checkers' judgment.
Some weeks later it was that I first met him, at Washington Park, Derby
Day. He told me afterward that the minute he saw me he knew me for a
"mark" and tried to "get next."
Yet, for all, Checkers was not innately bad. He was weak, I 'll admit,
and cruelly mistaken; but he had a simple, lovable nature, and a
natural longing for higher things. A case in point: I learned by
chance that he never missed a Sunday at church since the death of his
wife. He had no predilection, and I espied him one day in my own
sanctuary. When questioned about it he told me these facts, and
confessed to the pleasure he found in going.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account