Childhood in literature and art, with some observations on literature for children : $b A studyScudder, Horace Elisha
History
Childhood in literature and art, with some observations on literature for children : $b A study
Scudder, Horace Elisha
Children in art; Children in literature
“Peace! peace!
Dost thou not see my baby at my breast
That sucks the nurse asleep?”
There is a charming illustration of the blending of the classic myth of
Amor with actual childhood in these lines of A Midsummer-Night’s Dream,
where Helena says,
“Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind;
And therefore is winged Cupid painted blind:
Nor hath Love’s mind of any judgment taste:
Wings and no eyes figure unheedy haste:
And therefore is Love said to be a child,
Because in choice he is so oft beguiled.
As waggish boys in games themselves forswear,
So the boy Love is perjured everywhere.”
In the noonday musing of Jaques, when the summer sky hung over the
greenwood, and he fell to thinking of the round world and all that dwell
therein, the Seven Ages of Man passed in procession before him:—
“At first the infant
Muling and puking in the nurse’s arms.
And then the whining school-boy, with his satchel
And shining morning face, creeping like snail
Unwillingly to school,”
until the last poor shambling creature is borne off in second childhood.
There are doubtless other passages which might be gleaned, but the
survey is full enough to show how scantily, after all, Shakespeare has
made use of the figure and the image of childhood. The reflection has
led an ingenious writer to explain the fact by the circumstances of
Shakespeare’s life, which hindered his study of children. “He was clearly
old for his age when still a boy, and so would have associated, not
with children, but with young men. His marriage as a mere lad and the
scanty legends of his youth all tend in the same direction. The course
of his life led him to live apart from his children in their youth; his
busy life in London brought him into the interior of but few families;
his son, of whom he saw but little, died young. If our supposition be
true, it is a pathetic thought that the great dramatist was shut out
from the one kind of companionship which, even while it is in no degree
intellectual, never palls. A man, whatever his mental powers, can take
delight in the society of a child, when a person of intellect far more
matured, but inferior to his own, would be simply insufferable.”[32]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account