Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The long period of prosperity enjoyed by China under the T´ang is famed in
history as the golden age of literature and art. The age which produced
the poet Li Po, the painter Wu Tao-tzŭ, and the poet-painter Wang Wei,
whose "poems were pictures and his pictures poems," was indeed an age of
giants. It is certain that the potter's art shared in no small measure
the progress of the period, though at this distance of time we can hardly
expect that many monuments of this fragile art should have survived.
Indeed, it has been the custom of writers in the past to dismiss the
T´ang pottery in a few words, or to disregard it entirely as an unknown
quantity Here, however, we have again been well served by the ancient
burial customs of the Chinese, which still held good for part, at least,
of the T´ang period.
The T´ang mortuary wares are similar in intention to those of the Han,
but bespeak a much maturer art. The modelling of the tomb figures, which
have been aptly compared with the Tanagra statuettes of ancient Greece,
displays greater skill, spirit, and delicacy, and the materials used are
more refined and varied. The body of the ware, which is usually fine as
pipeclay, varies in hardness from soft earthenware, easily scratchable
with a knife, to a hard porcellanous stoneware, and in colour from
light grey and pale rosy buff to white, like plaster-of-Paris. The
usual covering is a thin, finely crackled glaze of pale straw colour or
light transparent green, and sometimes the surface has a wash of white
clay between the body and the glaze. Some of the figures, however, are
more richly coated in amber brown and leaf green glazes with occasional
splashes of blue, while on others are found traces of unfired red and
black pigments.
But as the mortuary pottery[41] comprises the largest and most important
group of T´ang wares at present identified, we cannot do better than
consider it first and as a separate class, setting forth at once the
reasons for assigning it to this particular period. As will be seen in
the note to the previous chapter (p. 17), earthenware appears to have
been to a great extent superseded by wood as the fashionable material for
sepulchral furniture towards the end of the T´ang period. This in itself
is strong _primâ facie_ evidence that the tombs furnished throughout with
pottery are not later than the T´ang dynasty. Another argument of an
ethnographical nature is supplied by the figures of ladies with feet of
normal size. The fashion of cramping the feet, though it may have begun
before the T´ang period, was certainly not universal until the end of this
long dynasty.[42]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account