Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
Civilization and ethics : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 2
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History; Ethics
Treat as befits a man endowed with reason, that is magnanimously and
nobly, the animals which are not so endowed, and indeed all creatures
whatever that can feel but have no reason. But other men, since they
are endowed with reason, treat with friendly affection.
Thou has existed till now as a fragment of the universe, and wilt some
day be absorbed in thy producer, or rather, thou wilt suffer a
transformation and reappear as a new germ of life.
Many grains of incense are destined for the same altar. Some fall soon
into the flame, others later, but that makes no difference.
The Optimistic-Ethical World-View of the later Stoicism
In their optimistic-ethical world-view the later Stoics find those
impulses to effort which were not available for the ancient ethics of
the classical age. Marcus Aurelius is an enthusiastic utilitarian like
the Rationalists of the eighteenth century, because, like them, he is
convinced that nature itself has bound up together what is ethical and
what is advantageous to the individual and to the community.
That being so, the classical question of ancient ethics whether the
thinking man is to busy himself with public affairs or not must again
be discussed. Epicurus taught that “the wise man has nothing to do
with State affairs unless exceptional circumstances arise.” Zeno’s
decision was that “he will take part in the business of the State
unless obstacles prevent it.” Both schools leave the retirement into
oneself to the decision of the Wise man, only one lets the grounds for
the decision be given somewhat earlier, the other somewhat later. The
thought of a devotion to the general good which is to be kept active
for its own sake and under all circumstances is outside the circle of
vision of their ethic.
With the later Stoics it emerges, because the conception of “mankind”
has come in sight. Man, as Seneca works out in his treatise on Leisure
(_De Otio_), belongs to two republics. One is a large and universal
one, extends as far as the sun shines, and embraces both gods and men;
the other is that into which through the fate assigned us by our [pg
058] birth, we have been adopted as citizens. Circumstances may bring
it about that the wise man cannot dedicate himself to the service of
the State, but, to escape the storm, must “take refuge in the
harbour.” It may happen—and Seneca has in mind his own time—that not
one of existing States is of such a character as to put up with the
activity of the wise man. Nevertheless, the latter does not wholly
withdraw into himself, but he serves the great republic by working to
improve the general outlook of mankind, and to hasten the coming of a
new age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account