Cleopatra's needle : $b with brief notes on Egypt and Egyptian obelisksWilson, Erasmus, Sir
History
Cleopatra's needle : $b with brief notes on Egypt and Egyptian obelisks
Wilson, Erasmus, Sir
Cleopatra's Needle (London, England); Obelisks
The chronology of ancient Egypt is a subject not without its
difficulties, open to a variety of opinion, and involved in perplexing
uncertainty. Nevertheless, the mind naturally yearns for information
as to the time of an occurrence, and the opportunity of comparing it
with coincident events. Ptolemy Philadelphus made a first step towards
a better state of knowledge, when in the year 250 B.C. he commissioned
Manetho, an Egyptian priest, experienced in the learning of Heliopolis,
to draw up a list of the kings of Egypt from the earliest times.
Manetho performed his task ably; but, alas! the book was injured, and
in troublous times a part of it was lost: nevertheless, that which
remains is still a valuable record; and had the book been preserved
entire, it would have settled many problems at present difficult of
solution. Manetho groups the kings of Egypt into thirty-four reigning
families or dynasties, each containing a number of kings, and by
calculating backwards, from the known to the unknown, he arrives
at the year 5504 B.C. as the date of Menes, the first king of the
first dynasty; that is to say, nearly seven thousand years from the
present time. It is only fair to say, however, that several English
authorities, including Sir Gardner Wilkinson, have declared against
his dates, and have assumed the year 2700 B.C. to be more correct;
Josephus says 2320; Bunsen, 3623; and Brugsch, 4455: in fact, a
difference exists, on this point, between the German Egyptologists
alone, of upwards of two thousand years. Under such circumstances
it is encouraging to meet with an authority like Mariette Bey,
Conservator of the Museum of Egyptian Antiquities at Boulak, one who
has the best opportunities of investigation, and has devoted himself
thoroughly to his work, express his confidence in the fidelity of
Manetho’s list, and, at least provisionally, adopt his dynasties and
his dates. Modern discoveries, according to Mariette, have tended to
corroborate Manetho’s calculations; such, for example, as the tablets
of Abydos, of which one is preserved in the British Museum, and more
especially the tablet recently found by himself at Sakkarah, in the
tomb of an Egyptian priest. Next we have the hieroglyphic evidence of
the monuments, beginning with those of Usertesen; and later on, such
further elucidation by the engraving on the monuments as serves to
bring opposing opinion to an exact agreement. Thus, the date of the
reign of Psammeticus I., of the twenty-sixth dynasty, as stated by
Wilkinson, is 664 B.C.; while that of Bunsen and Mariette is 665 B.C.;
even to a year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account