Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
Diocletian would not have been called to Carnuntum, or, if called, he
would scarcely have undertaken so tedious a journey, had there not been
affairs of the highest moment to be discussed. We know of only one
certain result of this strange council of Emperors. It is that a new
Augustus was created by Galerius without passing through the
intermediate stage of being a Cæsar. He was found in Licinius, to whom
was assigned the administration of Illyria with the command of the
Danubian legions, and the status of second rank in the hierarchy of the
Augusti, or rather of the Augusti in active life. Galerius, we may
infer, was sensible of the approaching breakdown of his health and
wished his friend Licinius to be ready to step into his place.
Apparently, a genuine attempt was made to restore to something like its
old position the system of Diocletian. Perhaps as reasonable a
supposition as any is that it was decided at the conference that
Diocletian and Maximian should again be relegated to the ranks of
retired Augusti, that Galerius and Licinius should be the two active
Augusti, and Constantine and Maximin the two Cæsars. Maximian had
unquestionably gone to Carnuntum with the hope of fishing in troubled
waters and Lactantius[33] even attributes to him a wild scheme for
assassinating Galerius. It is, at any rate, certain that he left the
conference in a fury of disappointment. The ambitious and restless old
man had received no encouragement to his hopes of again being supreme
over part of the Empire.
-----
Footnote 33:
_De Mort. Persec._, c. 29.
-----
But what then of Maxentius, who was in possession of Italy and Africa?
If the theory we have propounded be right, he must have been studiously
ignored and treated as a usurper, to be thrown out—just as Carausius had
been—at a favourable opportunity. There is a passage in Lactantius which
seems to corroborate this suggestion. That author says that Maximin
Daza, the Cæsar of Egypt and Syria and the old protégé of Galerius,
heard with anger that Licinius had been promoted over his head to be
Augustus and hold the second place in the charmed circle of Emperors. He
sent angry remonstrances; Galerius returned a soft answer. Maximin an
even more aggressive bearing (_tollit audacius cornua_), urged more
peremptorily than ever his superior right, and spurned Galerius’s
entreaties and commands. Then,—Lactantius goes on to say,—overborne by
Maximin’s stubborn obstinacy, Galerius offered a compromise, by naming
himself and Licinius as Augusti and Maximin and Constantine as Sons of
the Augusti, instead of simple Cæsars.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account