Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
His confidence, however, soon received a rude shock. The Franks were
restless and threatened invasion. Constantine marched north with his
army, leaving Maximian at Arles. He did not take his entire forces with
him, for a considerable number remained in the south of Gaul—no doubt to
guard the frontier against danger from Maxentius, though Lactantius
explains it otherwise. Maximian waited till sufficient time had elapsed
for Constantine to be well across the Rhine, and then began to spread
rumours of his having been defeated and slain in battle. For the third
time, therefore, he assumed the purple, seized the State treasuries, and
took command of the legions, offering them a large donative, and
appealing to their old loyalty. The usurpation was entirely successful
for the moment, but when Constantine heard of the treachery he hurried
back, leaving the affairs of the frontier to settle themselves.
Constantine knew the military value of mobility, and his soldiers
eagerly made his quarrel their own. There is an amusing passage in the
Seventh Panegyric[34] in which the orator says that the troops shewed
their devotion by refusing the offer of special travelling-money
(_viatica_) on the ground that it would hamper them on the march. Their
generous pay, they said, was more than sufficient, though no Roman army
before this time had ever been known to refuse money. Then he describes
how they marched from the Rhine to the Aar without rest, yet with
unwearied bodies; how at Chalons (Cabillonum) they were placed on board
river boats, but found the current too sluggish for their impetuous
eagerness to come to conclusions with the traitor, and cried out that
they were standing still; and how, even when they entered the rapid
current of the Rhone, its pace scarcely satisfied their ardour. Such,
according to the Court rhetorician, was the enthusiasm of the soldiers
for their young leader. When, at length, Arles was reached, it was found
that Maximian had fled to Marseilles and had shut himself up within that
strongly fortified town. His power had crumbled away. The legions, which
had sworn allegiance to him, withdrew it again as soon as they found
that he had lied to them of Constantine’s death; even the soldiers he
had with him in Marseilles only waited for the appearance of Constantine
before the walls to open the gates. The picture which Lactantius draws
of Constantine reproaching Maximian for his ingratitude while the
latter—from the summit of the wall—heaps curses on his head (_ingerebat
maledicta de muris_), or the companion picture of the anonymous
rhetorician, who shews us the scaling ladders falling short of the top
of the battlements and the devoted soldiers climbing up on their
comrades’ backs, are vivid but unconvincing. What emerges from their
doubtful narratives is that Marseilles was captured without a siege, and
that Maximian fell into the hands of his justly angry son-in-law, who
stripped him of his titles but vouchsafed to him his life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account