Cyclopedia of Commerce, Accountancy, Business Administration, v. 02 (of 10)American School of Correspondence
General
Cyclopedia of Commerce, Accountancy, Business Administration, v. 02 (of 10)
American School of Correspondence
Accounting; Business; Commerce
If the $4,000 wages paid is charged as direct or productive labor it
gives a cost of $102.56 each──an increase in cost with nothing in the
figures that shows the cause. If, however, an inefficiency charge of
$100 (2½% of $4,000) or $2.56 per machine is added as a separate
item, it is seen at once that here is an unusual item of expense. The
amount ($2.56 per machine) is included in the final costs, but in the
right place; there is no cause for confusion on account of an apparent,
but not real, increase in the productive labor cost. If the cost of
$100 per machine obtained during the preceding month is standard
for productive labor, it still is the attainable standard; the fact
of an unusual expense has in no way affected the legitimate cost of
productive labor.
Another great advantage in presenting the labor cost statistics in this
manner is that inefficiencies are shown in an understandable form.
The fact that indirect labor is increased, say 2%, might occasion no
comment; but if an inefficiency charge of even 1% is shown, it calls
for immediate investigation.
The establishment of standard or efficiency labor costs means
predetermined costs. This is a radical departure from established
custom; on its face, contrary to recognized accounting practice;
in results, wonderfully efficient. To determine standards in men,
material, and machines is a function of the engineer; the recording
of facts──the actual cost──is the function of the comptroller or
accountant. The two must work together. Properly prepared accounts,
showing actual costs with the items that make them segregated, show the
engineer how far short of possible standards the plant is running──the
extent of the inefficiency.
[Illustration: Fig. 34. Record Card for Applicants for Employment]
RECORDS OF EMPLOYES
=18.= In connection with the different time records designed to record
hours of service and units of production, there should be a personal
record of employes; and the more intimately personal it can be made,
the more valuable will the record become.
[Illustration: A BIRD'S─EYE VIEW OF THE PLANT OF STUDEBAKER BROS.
MANUFACTURING CO., SOUTH BEND, IND.]
Napoleon, it has been claimed, could call by name every man in his
armies, but, however great value may have been placed on such a memory
feat, the manager of the present─day great business organization, who
can call by name each of his employes, is an exception.
[Illustration: Fig. 35. Card for Record of Applicants]
[Illustration: Fig. 36. Card for Record of Employes]
It is not necessary that he should do so, for, as business is now
specialized and departmentized, he needs to know only the results
of the labor of those employes. By this is not meant that he should
not take an interest in the personality of his organization; on the
contrary, he should be very much interested, but he can be relieved
from burdening his mind with details by means of simple records.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account