Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles DarwinDarwin, Charles
Science
Darwinism stated by Darwin himself: Characteristic passages from the writings of Charles Darwin
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology)
From the facts alluded to in the first chapter, I think there can be no
doubt that use in our domestic animals has strengthened and enlarged
certain parts, and disuse diminished them, and that such modifications
are inherited. Under free nature we have no standard of comparison by
which to judge of the effects of long-continued use or disuse, for we
know not the parent forms; but many animals possess structures which
can be best explained by the effects of disuse. As Professor Owen has
remarked, there is no greater anomaly in nature than a bird that can
not fly; yet there are several in this state. The logger-headed duck of
South America can only flap along the surface of the water, and has its
wings in nearly the same condition as the domestic Aylesbury duck: it
is a remarkable fact that the young birds, according to Mr. Cunningham,
can fly, while the adults have lost this power. As the larger
ground-feeding birds seldom take flight, except to escape danger, it
is probable that the nearly wingless condition of several birds, now
inhabiting or which lately inhabited several oceanic islands, tenanted
by no beast of prey, has been caused by disuse. The ostrich, indeed,
inhabits continents, and is exposed to danger from which it can not
escape by flight, but it can defend itself by kicking its enemies as
efficiently as many quadrupeds. We may believe that the progenitor
of the ostrich genus had habits like those of the bustard, and that,
as the size and weight of its body were increased during successive
generations, its legs were used more, and its wings less, until they
became incapable of flight.
* * * * *
[Page 109.]
The insects in Madeira which are not ground-feeders, and which, as
certain flower-feeding _Coleoptera_ and _Lepidoptera_, must habitually
use their wings to gain their subsistence, have, as Mr. Wollaston
suspects, their wings not at all reduced, but even enlarged. This is
quite compatible with the action of natural selection. For, when a new
insect first arrived on the island, the tendency of natural selection
to enlarge or to reduce the wings would depend on whether a greater
number of individuals were saved by successfully battling with the
winds, or by giving up the attempt and rarely or never flying. As with
mariners shipwrecked near a coast, it would have been better for the
good swimmers if they had been able to swim still farther, whereas it
would have been better for the bad swimmers if they had not been able
to swim at all and had stuck to the wreck.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account