They had another child, and another, and another and another. A man
and a woman who can do nothing else can always have children, and, if
they are legally married and are able to support their progeny, there
seems no end to the amount of begetting they may do and the laurel
crowns of virtue to which they are thereby entitled. Isabel put her
vitality into child-bearing, boosting George Augustus to profitable
action, thrusting herself ever onward and upward financially and
socially, buying and furnishing houses, quarrelling with her friends,
acquiring sheiks, malforming her children’s minds, capriciously
interfering with their education, swanking to the Hartlys with her
money, patronizing the now aged and less venomous dear Mamma, and other
lofty and inspiring activities. Was she happy? What a question! We are
not placed here by a benevolent Providence to be happy, but to make
ourselves unpleasant to our neighbours and to impose the least amiable
portions of our personalities on as many people as possible. Was George
Augustus happy? Which I parry with—did he deserve to be happy? He
made money anyway, which is more than you and I can do. He dropped
claret for whiskey, and the æsthetes for the “English Classics,” all
those “noble” authors who have “stood the test of time,” and thereby
become so very dull that one prefers to go to the cinema which has not
stood any such test. He had a brougham, in which he drove daily to his
office. He became a Worshipful Grand Master, and possessed any amount
of funny little medals and coloured leather _cache-sexe_, which are
apparently worn in the Mysteries of the Free Masons. He framed his
certificates as a Solicitor, a Buffalo, a Druid, and all the other
queer things, and hung them in various places to surprise and awe the
inexperienced. He had a great many bills. For about ten years he was so
prosperous that he was able to give up attending Church on Sundays.
[ IV ]
George, the younger, liked Hamborough best perhaps, Martin’s Point
next, Pamber hardly at all, and he detested Dullborough, the town which
contained his father’s offices and the minor public school which he
attended.
The mind of a very young child is not very interesting. It has
imagination and wonder, but too unregulated, too bizarre, too “quaint,”
too credulous. Does it matter very much that George babbled o’ white
lobsters, stirred up frogs in a bucket, thought that the word “mist”
meant sunset, and was easily persuaded that a sort of milk pudding he
detested had been made from an ostrich’s egg? Of course a good deal of
adult imagination consists in peoples’ persuading themselves that they
can see white lobsters, just as their poetry consists in persuading
themselves that the milk pudding _did_ come out of the ostrich’s egg.
The child at least is honest, which is something. But on the whole the
young child-mind is boring.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account