Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
TABLE 4.
_Table Showing Weight of Normal Heart in
Relation to Body Weight. Number of Specimens
used to Determine Weight Quoted in Parenthesis._
════════════════╤═══════════════════════════════
Average Heart of│Grams per Kilogram of Body.[12]
────────────────┼───────────────────────────────
Man ( 4)│ 5.67
Primates ( 4)│ 6.56
Carnivora ( 6)│ 6.78
Rodentia ( 5)│ 5.
Ungulata (10)│ 5.8
Marsupialia ( 3)│ 5.1
│ Average 5.82
Passeres (43)│ 19.8
Picariæ ( 9)│ 21.3
Striges ( 4)│ 7.33
Psittaci ( 6)│ 8.89
Accipitres ( 7)│ 12.32
Columbæ ( 4)│ 14.47
Galli (16)│ 11.08
Fulicariæ ( 3)│ 23.82
Limicolæ ( 2)│ 8.78
Anseres (14)│ 11.8
Struthiones ( 1)│ 12.7
│ Average 13.84
────────────────┴───────────────────────────────
For meaning of italics see foot note Table 1.
However, there are many reasons why great caution should be used in
evaluating the relative size of the heart. Welcher showed in his work
that the proportion is greater in small and young animals than in large
and adult ones. All the authors quoted agree that in birds and to less
degree but still clearly in mammals, there is a direct relationship
between the bodily activity of an animal and its cardiac bulk. This is
fairly well shown in the list of avian heart ratios, but not so clearly
in the mammals. What shall be considered the most active mammals—the
monkey, perhaps, with his tendency to be occupied constantly, yet we
find the greatest heart bulk among the Carnivora, animals prepared for
travel and struggle, and the smallest among the Rodentia, quiet and
timid animals. The avian order showing the greatest cardiac ratio, the
Fulicariæ, shore birds, is made up of some quiet hiding varieties, and
of some capable of very prolonged flight; the most constantly active
fliers (Passeres) also have a high cardiac weight proportion. The
inactive owls have the smallest heart bulk.
The contrast between the average heart-to-body weights of mammals and
birds is striking, the latter having two and one-half times as much as
the former, 5.8 _vs._ 13.8. Since this is the most prominent and best
supported statement in the table of weights, it may be used to compare
with the incidence of the pathology as seen in the two classes.
Degenerations and inflammations occur in mammals and birds as 9.5 is to
5.5.[13]
Hypertrophies occur in mammals and birds as 10.3 is to 4.3.[13]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account