Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
An analysis of the various strategies of religion in establishing
contact with the historic situations and social realities in which it
must function reveals, in short, that it can pursue no course which
is altogether free of peril to its moral values. Capitulation without
conflict reduces religion to magic and secularizes life. A stubborn
conflict with the intractable forces of nature and history results in
some kind of compromise. Neither papal internationalism nor puritan
plutocracy are what the idealists who were responsible for them really
desired. And what they really desired fell short of their pretended
goals. Withdrawal from the world is equally dangerous. For it may
lead either to the morbid artificialities of asceticism or to the
sentimental subjectivism of quietistic religion. There are values in
each of the various strategies as well as perils. Perhaps those who
are too critical of their limitations can never create their values.
Religion must create its values in naïve faith and subject their
limitations to a critical intelligence. Of the various strategies
asceticism is probably nearest to the real genius of religion and most
adequate for the moral needs of our day. If a world is completely
astray the higher perspective from which it may be convicted of sin and
the greater dynamic which may function redemptively in its life both
depend upon some kind of detachment of religion from life.
CHAPTER VI
SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND ETHICAL IMPOTENCE
While there is good reason to regret the individualism of Protestantism
in a civilization which has increased the intimacy of all human
relations and made social and economic interdependence a basic fact,
yet it alone cannot be held responsible for the unethical nature
of modern society. This is attributable as much to the greater
difficulties which the human conscience faces in modern life as to any
weakness in the moral and religious idealism by which it is informed. A
much more adequate type of religious idealism might have been unequal
to the task of preserving ethical values in modern life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account