Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
An appearance of regard for the liberty of the subject was indeed kept
up, and on the 23d February 1692, a committee of the Privy Council was
appointed to go to the prisons of Edinburgh and Canongate, and inspect
the recruits kept there, so as to ascertain if there were any who were
unjustly detained against their will. But this was really little more
than an appearance for decency’s sake, the instances of disregard for
individual rights being too numerous even in their own proceedings to
allow any different conclusion being arrived at.[81]
[Sidenote: FEB.]
Two ministers at Dumfries, who had been ‘preachers before prelacy was
abolished,’ gave displeasure to the populace by using the Book of Common
Prayer. On a Sunday, early in this month, a party of about sixteen ‘mean
country persons living about four or five miles from Dumfries, who
disowned both Presbyterian and Episcopal ministers, and acknowledged
none but Mr Houston,’ came and dragged these two clergymen out of the
town, took from each his prayer-book, and gave them a good beating,
after which they were liberated, and allowed to return home. At an early
hour next morning, the same party came into the town and burned one of
the books at the Cross, on which they affixed a placard, containing, we
may presume, a declaration of their sentiments. The Privy Council
indignantly called the provost of Dumfries before them, and while
censuring him for allowing such a riot to take place, enjoined him to
take care ‘that there be no occasions given for the like disorders in
time coming.’ That is to say, the Privy Council did not desire the
Dumfries magistrates to take any measures for preventing the attacks of
‘mean country persons’ upon unoffending clergymen using the forms of
prayer sanctioned in another and connected kingdom not thirty miles
distant, but to see that such clergymen were not allowed to give
provocations of that kind to ‘mean country persons.’
[Sidenote: 1699. MAR.]
Dumfries had at this time another trouble on its hands. Marion Dickson
in Blackshaw, Isobel Dickson in Locherwood, Agnes Dickson (daughter of
Isobel), and Marion Herbertson in Mousewaldbank, had for a long time
been ‘suspected of the abominable and horrid crime of witchcraft,’ and
were believed to have ‘committed many grievous malefices upon several
persons their neighbours and others.’ It was declared to be damnifying
‘to all good men and women living in the country thereabouts, who cannot
assure themselves of safety of their lives by such frequent malefices as
they commit.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account