Dropped stitches in Tennessee historyAllison, John
History
Dropped stitches in Tennessee history
Allison, John
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845 -- Homes and haunts -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- History
logical explanation of the motive which prompted Robertson and Hays to
compliment him by giving his name to the newly established judicial
district.
In 1788 Miro was made civil and military governor and intendant of
Louisiana and West Florida. In this year McGillivray wrote him that
two delegates from the district of Cumberland had just visited him
with proposals of peace; that they were in extremities on account of
the incursions of his (McGillivray’s) warriors, and would submit to
whatever conditions he might impose; and, “presuming that it would
please me, they added that they would throw themselves in the arms
of His Majesty as subjects, and that Kentucky and Cumberland are
determined to free themselves from Congress; that they no longer owe
obedience to a power which is incapable of protecting them. They
desired to know my sentiments on the propositions, but as it embraces
important political questions, I thought proper not to divulge my
views.” Miro, commenting on this letter, says:
I consider as extremely interesting the intelligence conveyed to
McGillivray by the deputies on the fermentation existing in Kentucky,
with regard to a separation from the Union. Concerning the proposition
made to McGillivray by the inhabitants of Cumberland to become the
vassals of His Majesty, I have refrained from returning any precise
answer.
McGillivray was no doubt, at the very time he was writing to Miro,
also in the service and pay of the British; for, in April, 1788, in a
letter dated at “Little Tellisee, Upper Creek Nation,” and addressed
to Colonels Anthony Bledsoe and James Robertson, he says, among other
things:
Mr. Hackett arrived here a few Days ago and Delivered me your letter,
together with one from Col. Hawkins. Agreeably to your request I will
be Explicit and Candid in my answer to yours, and will not deny that
my Nation had waged war against your Country for several years past,
but that we had no motives of revenge, nor did it proceed from any
Sense of Injurys Sustained from your people, but being warmly attached
to the British, and being under their Influence, our operations were
directed by them against you in common with other Americans.
The letter from which the foregoing is quoted is of considerable
length. I have seen the original, with two others, and have “true and
perfect copies” of all three.[L] That from which I have quoted above
bears entirely upon the subject of a peace proposed between the Creek
nation and Cumberland in the letter of Colonels Bledsoe and Robertson
to which it is an answer; and there is not one word in McGillivray’s
letter which indicates, even remotely, that Robertson and Bledsoe had
made any such proposition to him as he had communicated to Miro. Col.
Robertson had written him, telling him, among other things, that a
number of the settlers on Cumberland had been killed recently by his
warriors--“among those unfortunate persons,” says Robertson, “were my
third son.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account