Arist. _Phys._ Γ, 4. 203 b 25, ἀπείρου δ’ ὄντος τοῦ ἔξω (sc. τοῦ
οὐρανοῦ), καὶ σῶμα ἄπειρον εἶναι δοκεῖ καὶ κόσμοι (sc. ἄπειροι). It is
to be observed that the next words—τί γὰρ μᾶλλον τοῦ κενοῦ ἐνταῦθα ἢ
ἐνταῦθα;—show clearly that this refers to the Atomists as well; but
the ἄπειρον σῶμα will not apply to them. The suggestion is rather that
both those who made the Boundless a body and those who made it a κενόν
held the doctrine of ἀπειροι κόσμοι in the same sense.
Footnote 128:
See below, § 53. Cf. Diels, _Elementum_, pp. 63 sqq.
[Sidenote: Origin of the heavenly bodies.]
19. The doxographers have not left us in the dark as to the process by
which the different parts of the world arose from the Boundless. The
following statement comes ultimately from Theophrastos:—
He says that something capable of begetting hot and cold was separated
off from the eternal at the origin of this world. From this arose a
sphere of flame which grew round the air encircling the earth, as the
bark grows round a tree. When this was torn off and enclosed in
certain rings, the sun, moon, and stars came into existence.—Ps.-Plut.
_Strom._ fr. 2 (R. P. 19).
We see from this that when a portion of the Boundless had been separated
off from the rest to form a world, it first of all differentiated itself
into the two opposites, hot and cold. The hot appears as a sphere of
flame surrounding the cold; the cold, as earth with air surrounding it.
We are not told, however, in this extract how the cold came to be
differentiated into earth, air, and water; but there is a passage in
Aristotle’s _Meteorology_ which throws some light on the subject. We
read there:—
But those who are wiser in the wisdom of men give an origin for the
sea. At first, they say, all the terrestrial region was moist; and, as
it was dried up by the sun, the portion of it that evaporated produced
the winds and the turnings of the sun and moon, while the portion left
behind was the sea. So they think the sea is becoming smaller by being
dried up, and that at last it will all be dry.—_Meteor._ Β, 1. 353 b
5.
* * * * *
And the same absurdity arises for those who say that the earth and the
terrestrial part of the world at first were moist, but that air arose
from the heat of the sun, and that the whole world was thus increased,
and that this is the cause of winds and the turnings of the
heavens.[129]—_Ib._ 2. 355 a 21 (R. P. 20 a).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account